TL;DR

  • The European Council has ended its adoption procedure for rules related to phones with replaceable batteries.
  • By 2027, all phones released in the EU must have a battery the user can easily replace with no tools or expertise.
  • The regulation intends to introduce a circular economy for batteries.
  • SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now we just need headphone jacks and SD cards and lineageos support and my dream phone will be mandated.

      • catharticrespite@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Between basic storage being so much larger than it used to be (the 4-8GB days were brutal) and USB-C flash drives that can plug into your charging port, I seldom miss them these days

        Still sucks that they removed them as an option though

    • serv@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Xperia phones have headphone jacks and SD cards. Pretty sure you can install lineage on them as well.

    • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I pretty much stopped using my phone for audio when they got rid of the headphone jack.

      Wireless headphones still aren’t great and most are uncomfortable. It’s super annoying keeping them charged and they are so expensive when you consider how short their lifespan is.

      • SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I listen to certain YouTube videos to get to sleep and have for years and years. Wireless ear buds just aren’t in the cards for something like that.

        • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m in a similar boat. The only time I do plug in headphones (via the usb port) is on nights I’m having a very hard time fall asleep. But I do that at the expense of being able to charge my phone 😔

          • SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Man, that sucks. One of the other things for me is that you can buy decent headphones for like seven bucks with a 3.5mm jack. Most USB headsets are going to be a lot more expensive.

            Does your phone support qi charging? That could be a solution if it does.

    • pacjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not a fan of xiaomi (even though it’s my daily driver), but most of their phones fit your needs. In the past I used redmi note 4, note 9 pro and now note 10 pro and they’ve all been great.

      Custom roms community really is something.

    • joshuaacasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can get onboard with (micro) sd card slots. But honestly I’m fine with not having a headphone jack. I never used it anyway. And wireless earbuds are way more convenient anyway because you don’t have a wire tethering your phone to your ears.

      Edit: I should add that GrapheneOS is way more privacy-oriented and secure than LineageOS.

  • joshuaacasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    FANTASTIC. I’m just disappointed that it’s as far away as 2027 and not 2024 or 2025 :(

    Edit: Oh, I just read this part

    By 2027, all phones released in the EU must have a battery the user can easily replace with no tools or expertise.

    So…I’m sure us North Americans will still get screwed with nonreplaceable batteries :(

    • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well some GDPR implementations did make it across the pond for the sake of simplicity so I imagine this might go the same way.

      • adriaan@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the case of GDPR it is not just for simplicity. It’s because companies that operate in the EU need to provide those protections to all EU citizens, even those across the pond. You cannot check if someone is an EU citizen so if you operate in the EU you effectively need to treat everyone like an EU citizen.

    • darkwiiingduck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not really as a design change as drastic as user exchangeable batteries means phone companies would probably rather adopt a unified design (removable batteries) than a region based design

    • Redex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      2027 is actually pretty early for such a dramatic change, and somewhere I heard that it’s all phones sold, if that’s the case (i.e. you can’t sell old models if they don’t have easily replaceable batteries) than that is a really early date for such a law.

  • 0421008445828ceb46f496700a5fa6@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hopefully this doesn’t go the way of charging cables and we have a different battery shape for every phone… Otherwise a 2040 regulation will be to standardize battery shape(s)

    • Vega@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Battery shape (and connector) will sadly still be a thing for a long time, and usually it’s for engineering reasons, so I don’t really think it will be possible to standardize it

      • DeanFogg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        We really should just adopt the “best one” that becomes the standard. Only change it with significant advancement

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          It depends on the layout of the phone though. Size of camera module, placement of fingerprint sensors, other sensors/modules, heat sinks. You name it, really.

          As such the batteries tend to be oddly shaped, and even spread out in different places to get as much battery in as possible.

          The “best one” differs from phone to phone.

          • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I‘ve had a couple dozen different phone batteries in my hand. It’s really not that complicated if you have to make it work. Sure, manufacturers will yell that they couldn’t make their 27 lenses at the edge of the case work. I say make them 16:9 in 5 different sizes and manufacturers can work around that, end of story. New sizes can be adopted if the benefit for everyone outweighs the cost.

            • Dojan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’d really like to see it but I don’t think we will see it unless legislation forces it.

              I’d like to see it in more than just phones. Standardise battery sizes for cars and other vehicles as well, and make it possible to replace them manually. If there were automated battery charging stations I might even be convinced that electric cars will work for more than just city travel.

              • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I agree again. EVs do work imo but proprietary stuff always gets in the way. It’s actually time to reform the way intellectual property works and is enforced. It’s a way to leech out millions of dollars for insanely old or convoluted content which is not how our world functions anymore. There should be a limit on how big of an idea can be patented as well. Just think about tissues in boxes. If that got patented, they would be insanely expensive. That’s why I think things that are insanely common (medical formulas) should have very short patent spans. We need to take power away from megacorps (which is a can of worms in itself). Same goes for ev batteries, vaccines, etc.

                • Dojan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I agree with you entirely. Maybe not so much on EVs, but my only real gripe with them is the battery, which would be solved if we standardised battery sizes and engineered some sort of solution which allowed for “swapping stations” to automatically swap out batteries. It would require makers to design and engineer their cars around these swappable batteries but I think that’s the way to go.

                  The way it’d work today is if some manufacturer implemented this, it’d be some sort of proprietary BS thing and it just wouldn’t work in practise. Legislating a standard for all the manufacturers to adhere to is the only real workable way of doing something like that.

        • richardwonka@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          There isn’t one “best one”. Always depends on requirements, which vary by device, underlying technology and use case.

    • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well battery shapes will be custom, but the regulation does include demand to offer said batteries as spare parts.

      shall ensure that those batteries are available as spare parts of the equipment that they power for a minimum of five years after placing the last unit of the equipment model on the market, with a reasonable and non-discriminatory price for independent professionals and end-users.

      This being EU, EU will actually even police that reasonability clause via consumer protection agencies. You might not like the still probably pretty hefty price, but outright monopoly price gouging will not be allowed. Atleast not with in EU jurisdiction. Also makers will tend to gravitate to number of pretty standard battery sizes and geometries. Simply out of economies of scale. If you have to offer the batteries available as spares. You don’t want to offer 150 different battery models on you warehousing and supply to your retail stores. You want as few as possible. Maybe say 5 different sizes or maybe couple ten different kinds on the biggest makers with the largest product range. Cheaper to buy more of similar batteries from battery supplier, than have custom module developed for each new phone model. Well unless one is apple and only has couple new models per year. They probably will have now just little bit different optimized shape battery for each models, but they also have the scale per model to make sense for that.

      also:

      Software shall not be used to impede the replacement of a portable battery or LMT battery, or of their key components, with another compatible battery or key components.

      Meaning companies can’t use software locks to deny third party batteries. Since the language says compatible battery, not replacement battery. Which wouldn’t make sense anyway, since replacement battery would be the one the OEM offers. Ofcourse I’m sure there will be lot of hurdur by makers over “don’t use third party batteries, those aren’t as safe” and “well but that isn’t compatible”. However as one remembers during the early 2000’s and upto mid 2010’s there was a very healthy both OEM and third party replacement battery market. As with that experience, yes shoddy batteries from non-reputable people can be problem. However in this basic consumer electronic safety regulation (aka you can’t just shovel anything to the market with utterly nuts unsafe circuitry in the first place) and the market itself handles it. Again it will be found out over little time, which makers are the reputable ones with the good batteries with all the proper safeties and good production quality. Reputable big chain electronics dealers then focus on only offering the established reputable third party batteries and parts out of their own reputation (You sold me a shoddy battery. It burst and ruined my phone. I’m never buying from this phone store ever again). Plus same with the actual makers with stuff like offering extensive warranties, warranting the replacement of the device, if their battery messes it up and so on.

      This is all “we have already been here” ground except instead of the T9 numpad on the phone front, there is now a whole front covering touch screen on it’s place.

  • esty@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    if this makes batteries smaller so be it

    let’s go back to 2012 and carry a few of them at a time

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s no need. Battery tech has advanced substantially. There is no reason phones shouldn’t last all day and then some, then when the battery becomes shitty, replace it instead of massive e-waste. We’re lucky the EU exist.

    • spiderman@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s kinda annoying and sad to see that EU have to make bills these days for basic things that android had a decade ago.

    • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      a lot of industries seem to solve problems well initially, then backtrack and make their product purposefully shitty in order to capture more revenue.

  • Reclipse@lemdro.idOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    The headline says it’s official. But then the article mentions -

    Now, the only step left is for the European Council and Parliament to sign on the dotted line.

    So it’s not official?? Can anyone explain please??

  • NightOwl@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is a special day when there is happy tech news. This is a day for celebration. Having done my own battery replacements some have been a nightmare to do with all the glue and hoping the screen doesn’t break. I look forward to this, since with rise of phone costs I don’t intend to update frequently. I’d actually change my battery annually if it wasn’t such a hassle.

  • evo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    One thing I haven’t seen mentioned is that this will inevitably make batteries smaller.

    If you are supposed to be able to open the phone and remove the battery manufacturers need to design a way to remove the cover, shield other components, create a compartment for the battery, and use sturdier batteries. All of those things take us space. Manufacturers aren’t just going to make phones thicker so that physical space has to be eaten by something… and it’s going to be the battery.

    I really liked having a removable battery on my phone 10 years ago in case I had a particularly long/intensive day. But now that I make it through a day without worry this could actually be sorta annoying.

    • Raikin@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, I use a fairphone (with removable battery) and in a normal day it can go a whole day without going below 20%. And even if I don’t comsider ot too much of a hassle bringing an external battery for recharge with me when I know I’m gonna use it a lot or will not have time to recharge during the night.

      • Fritee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        To add, I think the batter capacity of a fairphone is 3905 mAh while eg Pixel 7 has 4355 so the diff is only ~10%

        If I can replace a battery without throwing away the phone, I’d definitely be OK with 10% battery reduction

    • Erich@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we are gonna get removable batteries there needs to be a standard battery format so that each company won’t have its own special battery design. One battery design for all devices. This way the battery will work in whichever phone you put it in.

        • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t believe so. A battery standard would specify the interface, not the actual battery design from a technical standpoint. It would specify:

          • size and shape, i.e. where connectors go, assuring it fits in a phone
          • voltage and amperage provided

          The rest is up to the battery manufacturer and is completely open to innovation. You want to put a Li-ion battery in there? Just make it the right shape and as long as it can provide the output required, it’s fine. Want some future-tech fusion battery? As long as it’s the right shape and puts out the required power!

    • b3nsn0w@pricefield.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      sure, but we’re at a point with battery chemistry where that no longer really matters that much. the fairphone 4 is already at 3900 mAh and with both phone electronics constantly getting smaller and battery chemistry improving, it’s highly likely that this year’s fairphone 5 will not only crack the 4000 mAh barrier but fly past it. with a modern mid-range soc (which is really all you need to have a smooth experience outside of games) it’ more than enough to get you through the day with a good margin to spare. and that’s already a user-servicable design that no doubt guided eu legislature on this issue.

      • ki77erb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fine print will probably say if you don’t replace the seal when replacing the battery, or get it professionally changed, your warranty is void.

          • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you have any source to that? Manufacturer saying “replace the rubber seal which blocks water when you replace the battery, else you’re operating the device incorrectly and thus caused avoidable damage, and warranty is now void,” sounds ok and legal to me. It’d be similar to leaving your battery door literally open then you complain water got in.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really, I have a chinese ip68 certified phone (and actually tested it, no water got in) and the battery is replaceable

  • ssm@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why the hell do we need to wait for 2027 for this? Perfect amount of time for something like this to get overturned at the last minute.