• mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Every iteration of me from 1994 to now is coming to your home to kick your ass right up and out past your teeth for calling the OG Crow a bad movie.

      Yes, most of us will be in face paint. Some of us may have black trench coats on. There may even be some hammer pants, but we won’t talk about that.

    • sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Remakes that are better than the original:

      The Thing

      The Fly

      The Blob

      Invasion of the Body Snatchers

      Cat People

      Hmm. I’m noticing a trend here.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Seriously, there’s nothing inherently wrong with remakes but why do it if you’re not trying to make it BETTER? Or at least substantially different? Do a different take on the material, don’t just swap the CG animated boy for a real life actor while leaving everything including the CG animated dragon as it was, for fuck’s sake.

    • Blubber28@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Also, for those interested in more mature movies: Juror #2. I had good expectations and was not disappointed. At least, not by the movie. There were only a handful of people in an already small cinema room, only a week after release. Meanwhile, Gladiator II is drawing a lot of public.

      While I love shitting on CEOs and business people as much as the next left-oriented person, this trend in the movie industry is very much, at least partially, at fault due to many of the consumers.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Juror #2

        Thought provoking in that everyone who wants to convict is “because he’s a piece of shit, whether or not it is unlikely he did it”. How do you tell people they are pieces of shit themselves, without them reactively thinking you are? Is the big thought experiment this film provokes.

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    14 days ago

    Y2K. It was better than I expected!

    Also, I remember walking out of Everything Everywhere All At Once and being angry because it probably wouldn’t do well in theaters or win any awards, despite being one of the best original movies I had ever seen.

    I was happy to be wrong on that one.

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Another also, I absolute hate that the video game industry is jumping on this trend. Sometimes it’s nice to play games I missed out on as a kid but it’s getting so bad now, they remaster games from a couple years ago. Enough is enough.

  • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’m not against sequels/prequels, just need some more than “it’s the sequel to that one you liked”.

    OK, but why does it need a sequel? Can you make me interested in it aside from the fact it’s a sequel? Is it any good…?

    Not a movie or fully original, but I watched Arcane and I loved it. It was good without knowing about the game, and those who know the game say it’s better if you do. That’s what a sequel/remake/adaptation should strive for.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    14 days ago

    It’s to the point right now that a young person 20 years of age could spend a decade just watching all the old classics from the past 80 years to enjoy great films. If they stopped making movies tomorrow, there’s more than enough content now for people to watch.

    My wife wants to keep watching the latest stuff but if it were up to me, I’d just take the time to watch at least all of the AFI top 100 films… last I checked I think I’ve only seen about 30 of them and I thought I watched a lot of films. My last rough count of watched films that I could list was over 1,500 films. And I still have a waiting list of hundreds more I want to see.

    I’m a Trek fan and I thought I watched lots but I’ve only seen about half of all the TV series and most of the films.

    That’s also not counting all the other TV series I’d like to see from the past … MASH, All In The Family, Adam’s Family, The original Batman series, The Munsters, X Files, Walking Dead, Arrested Development, Battlestar Galactica, Twilight Zone, The Office … and on and on

    If my spouse wasn’t so stuck in watching the latest stuff I’d probably be happy just spending my time catching up on everything I wasn’t able to see for the past 30-40 years.

    • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      I agree. Its the same with literature as well. One thing I enjoy about older media is not feeling so drawn to reflect on any social commentary of my own time. To me it makes it more immersive and more about the timeless aspects of the story.

    • TheV2@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’m exactly that young person. I won’t be even able to consume every work of art I’m interested in. That’s both sad and amazing.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Good thing the critic was invented, my tip is to follow one and getting familiar with them, not looking at aggregate scores, because even if they dislike a movie, you’ll know if you would like it since you are familiar with their tastes.

    • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      So they take the risk of watching a movie that is somehow familiar to them ahead of watching it, and that might also be bad.

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 days ago

    The Banshees of Inisherin

    i watched it in a theater, because i’ve heard the movie was good. Didn’t read up much on it beforehand and enjoyed watching it, albeit not fully getting it i guess.

    It felt worth going to a theater for. Contrary to the last 3 or so Marvel movies i’ve seen in theater because friends dragged me and i ended up falling asleep every time.

  • SpiceDealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Movies and shows that I have watched this year in no particular order and not all released this year:

    The Beekeeper

    Iron Claw

    Say Nothing

    Altered States

    The Substance

    Oppenheimer

    Peaky Blinders (rewatch)

    Kneecap

    In The Name of the Father

    The Batman

    Lord of the Rings (rewatch)

    The Departed (rewatch)

    Deep Space Nine (haven’t finished)

    The Devil’s Own

    Sicario

    Additionally, my wife has recently started watching Gossip Girl but I only catch glimpses of that show. Did anybody actually like that show when it came out?

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Additionally, my wife has recently started watching Gossip Girl but I only catch glimpses of that show. Did anybody actually like that show when it came out?

      If you think of teenage girls as people, tons of people liked it when it came out. They also liked the books.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Millions Hundreds of beavers.

    On a projector at home.

    A silent film. From 2022.

    Bizarre. Stupid. Funny. Silly. Stupid. Cute. Bizarre. And stupid.

    ★★★★

  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 days ago

    The reason I believe sequels are doing good is:

    1. movie theaters have been perverted into massive and expensive hype fests
    2. in strong opposition, past movie theaters were not expensive to go to and got you entertained in a social setting
    3. due to the rise of large chains, small and cheaper theaters have died out.
    4. assumption: the price to rent a movie for your theater will probably be horrendous by now
    5. sequels have kind of a known quality which lowers the hurdle
    6. that means new movies could be watched in smaller theaters and would have to be sustainable for those
    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago
      • There used to be dozens of theaters in a city, each one with a different set of contracts playing a different set of movies. Nowadays there are hundreds of movies in a city, all of them with the same set of contracts playing the same 5 movies.

      • Yes, everything is too expensive, what means nobody can afford to take a risk. Not the public, not the theaters, not the studios. (You can see people on this thread commenting that they won’t.)

      • There are what? 3 movie studios nowadays? Or are those 2? Either way, you can’t expect diversity from that.

  • lordnikon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    I stopped watching almost all franchise and remakes. Horror seems be the only genre worth watching. I had the highest hopes for the creator so much wasted potential.

  • Gingernate@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    Bullshit. The box office speaks for itself. Maybe YOU want to see new movies. Regular people want the newest superhero shit movie and remakes

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      The huge improvements in TV screens have a lot to do with it too, I think.

      When we only had CRT screens at home it was a big jump in quality to go to the theater. But when you have a 4K screen in your living room, there’s less reason to go to the theater.

      • argv minus one@mastodon.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        It’s not just that they were CRTs.

        You can get an excellent picture from the CRT computer monitors of the '90s and '00s, with high resolution (up to 2048×1536—better than 1080p!) and color rendering that’s arguably better than modern LCDs.

        CRT TVs had low resolution, and NTSC/PAL has pretty bad color fidelity as well, but one of those high-definition CRTs connected to an RGB component video input (VGA or SCART) carrying high-definition content (DVD or Blu-Ray) is another story entirely.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          Yeah I was talking about TVs… we are discussing movies after all. Moreover, TVs that the average person has.

          There’s a huge jump in quality between the TVs the average person has now compared to 20+ years ago.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 days ago

    The price of movies is too damn high to go out and watch them. My system at home is far more comfortable and costs barely anything.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      This checks out. I think the most recent “original” movie I watched was The Color Out of Space. Not in theater though.