• tourist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m not scared of nuclear power

    but hearing it in the same sentence as ‘Microsoft AI’ sent a shiver down my spine

  • HelloThere@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A 20 year deal, with no power produced until 2028?

    Either MS really do know something we don’t, or this bubble has grained a layer of strontium.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It doesn’t really matter whether it’s LLMs. There are limits to the value of creating an increasing amount of new hardware to do any particular math, but once you have the hardware it’s pretty easy to find applications for the electricity to pay for itself.

      There are countless spaces that will benefit from as much math as we can give them for a long time.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s the second one. They are all in on this AI bullshit because they’ve got nothing else. There are no other exponential growth markets left. Capitalism has gotten so autocanibalistic that simply being a global monopoly in multiple different fields isn’t good enough. For investors it’s not about how big your company is, how reliable your yearly returns are, how stable your customer base; the only thing that matters is how fast your business is growing. But small businesses have no space to grow because of the monopolies filling every available space, and the monopolies are already monopolies. There are no worlds left to conquer. They’ve already turned every single piece of our digital lives into a subscription, blockchain was a total bust, the metaverse was a demented fever dream, VR turned out to be a niche toy at best; unless someone comes up with some brand new thing that no one has ever heard of before, AI is the last big boondoggle they have left to hit the public with.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    So long as it’s not Microsoft managing the plant nor are they using any MS product to do so…

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      “sorry boss, just saw ‘restart’ and updated the code…that’s not going to cause any reactor problems will it?”

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Not this particular one. The only mention of IpenAI is

        Altman has backed and is the chairman of nuclear power startup Oklo (OKLO.N), which went public through a blank-check merger in May, while TerraPower - a startup Gates co-founded - broke ground on a nuclear facility in June.

      • Addv4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Truly erasing the carbon footprint for hundreds of miles around!

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Why in the world would you want to revive a clearly dangerous design of a plant.

    • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not only did you not read the article, but you apparently don’t know that much about TMI either. There are multiple reactors at TMI, the one that had the accident is not the one they’re restarting.

      The one they’re restarting shut down a few years ago, along with several other nuclear plants, due to being too expensive to compete on cost with all the cheap gas post fracking boom.

      Yes, for reasons passing understanding the state and federal government allowed existing, functional nuclear plants to close in favor of natural gas plants.

      • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I saw that it was a different reactor, but is the design that much different from the one they had the problem with?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      A poof of radioactive steam let loose. That’s it, the whole incident. People freaked out on March 28, 1979.

      In totally unrelated news, The China Syndrome, about a reactor meltdown, came out March 16, 1979.