• helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not really a “win” for anyone since it’s nothing but a suggestion:

      Euro NCAP is not a government regulator, so it has no power to mand

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      IMO the capacititive buttons with no feedback are even worse than the touch screen. at least with the touch screen, you will likely have a colored UI element on screen to press. with the cars that replace all the buttons with capacitive buttons with no feedback, theyre all the same color.

      • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        no feedback? 🤔

        either the button or an indicator lights up or you see/hear what the button is supposed to activate or stop

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          *haptic feedback. The touch and press should be two different actions, not the same action. Otherwise, you need to look at a button to know where it is and if it did what it was supposed to do, which distracts you from driving.

          Touchscreens are not that much better in this regard, IMO

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’d be fine with one that works like the Taptic engine on iPhones or how ever the trackpad on my Macbook does. It’s a solid surface with no moving parts but it clicks when you press it and it feels 100% the same as pressing a physical button. It’s way different than haptic feedback done with just the vibrator motor.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That doesn’t work well in a car though. It works in a phone because you’re holding it, or a trackpad because you’re putting a lot of pressure on it. In a car it’s already shaking from the engine, road, etc. Plus those taps are generally much shorter and lighter and less likely to feel the vibration.

    • Markimus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I do agree with you, though why not just not buy cars which have touch screen controls? You don’t need legislation to filter your purchases.

      • Rinox@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        You do though. Without legislations, cars wouldn’t have safety features by default like crumple zones, airbags etc. Without legislations, companies could do whatever they want to pad their bottom line. You need laws to define what is and isn’t acceptable, especially when it comes to safety.

    • summerof69@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I feel like I’m the only one here who is driving a car and not a spaceship. What’s there to interact with while you’re driving? Key multimedia buttons are already on the wheel.

          • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think the latest models also have the gear selector (or whatever they’re called for automatics / EVs) on the touch screen, so you need to swipe up to put it into drive.

            • marx2k@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              So… the entire car is bricked if that screen malfunctions and the car is not usable by those with poor motor skills in their right hand?

              • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Or left hand for right-hand drive cars, but yes.

                I watch the CarWow channel on YouTube and they review a lot of EV’s, and the host struggled with it - it would take him several attempts to get it into drive as he’d swipe up but not all the way so it would never actually engage. I guess in that case a software fix could be applied to make the control more sensitive but it’s still fucking stupid to have it there in the first place.

                Also for more WTFs, on that same channel, they do these challenges where they drive a bunch of EVs on a route and see which one goes the furthest, which has the closest range to what the manufacture claims it’ll do and what happens to the vehicle when it runs out of battery. There was an instance where the Tesla ran out of charge, but they couldn’t open the recharging port because the little door is electronic.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s actually one of my biggest gripes …. Washer and single wipe are on a control stalk but wiper speed is on touch screen.

          I think the theory is that wipers are automatic so you don’t usually need to control them manually, but that automation doesn’t work very well or maybe the rain sensor doesn’t work very well

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The problem with automation is usually that while it can do 90% of the cases well, and that’s where it brings value, for safety critical stuff, like critical car components, there needs to be a way to quickly and easily override it.

            In the 1994 Ford Mondeo I used to drive, if a truck with a poorly secured load and a questionably awake driver was barreling down the highway at 110-120 in a rainstorm, if I wanted to get the car ready to pass, it was one move to click the wiper into “wipe for your life” mode before the truck started to powerblast the windscreen with water splashing up from the tires.

            I’m not sure if I could do that in a Tesla, especially since if it does it only when it would already be needed, that’s too late. And the thing is, even if the automation did work, how do I know 100% it does work when I do something that would be dangerous if it did not work?

  • mindlight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Touch screen, Vibration feedback/Color change or not, means that you have to look at what your hand is doing and not on the road.

    A physical button means you can keep your eyes on the road and find the right button with easy.

    So let’s be honest. At this point, touch screens are chosen by car makers because cost and not design. So essentially, safety is less important than cost for the car makers.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Touch screens should not be used for any controls needed to operate a car. You can’t use them without taking your eyes off the road.

    • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Technically the only thing you’re allowed to fiddle with, while driving, is what you can operate from the steering wheel. You’re not supposed to fiddle with radio, AC etc. from the center console while driving even if it’s physical buttons.

      I know people don’t drive like this, but you’re only allowed to take your hands off the steering wheel for changing gears if driving a manual, otherwise it’s two hands on there at all times…technically

      • ZephrC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you read the article this is specifically about things needed to operate the car. Radios and AC or whatever is fine, but car manufacturers are starting to move things actually needed like turn signals into touch controls, and that is not okay.

  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Touch screens are great in cars! For one purpose. The navigation. The touchscreen should only display navigation and function as a keyboard to search it, and only while the car is stationary. Everything else should have a physical control, at bare minimum as “backup”

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Touch screens are great in cars!

      No, no they aren’t. If I have to stop to use a control in a car, it’s bad design.

      So far 15 18 23 people have shown they don’t know how to drive.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ok, lets hear your idea for how to navigate while driving. Please don’t say voice control, because voice control rarely works as needed.

        • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Passenger does it? Have a sensor to see if there is a passenger, then allow it.

          • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            And of course, we can rely on the universally true mutual exclusivity of always having a passenger when we need to navigate, and never needing to navigate when we don’t have any passengers. As constant as the north star, that one.

            • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              If you need to do navigation, you stop your car. If you have a passenger, he or she can do it while you are driving. It’s not that hard

  • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The main reason why I didn’t want high end packages for our last car was, that I am a cheap bastard. The second reason is, that I think touchscreens in cars are one of the dumbest ideas imaginable.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      There are places where touch controls make a lot of sense. Cars is not one of them.

      My stove also has touch controls and I’d like a stern word with whomever designed it because it’s the biggest fucking bullshit. I’ve burned myself on those controls, I’ve had the stove turn itself off and refuse to turn on again because of water splashing onto the controls, I’ve had it turn on and glitch out because I’ve cleaned it off with a slightly damp rag.

      When I’m driving I absolutely don’t want to dig through non-tactile menus just so I can adjust the climate or turn on my heated seat. Plus, the lack of tactility sucks for blind people. Sure blind people won’t drive, but imagine having to ask the driver to change your AC for you? In the dark of winter with ice on the roads that’s just horribly irresponsible of whomever designed it.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Tesla’s Model 3 uses a touchscreen for damn near everything. Some things are buried and require multiple presses in different places on the screen. It looks really good, but the actual purpose and the fact that humans driving at potentially deadly speeds need to operate it seems to have been placed a distant second to safety when the thing was designed. Given who is in charge of Tesla it’s not much of a surprise.