Well that didn’t take long. Looks like they’re going the discord route and locking uploads + basic customization behind a subscription. You know, because we don’t already have enough of those.

Bluesky is working on a premium subscription that will add features like higher-quality video uploads and some profile customization options.

        • Corgana@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Oh, absolutely! I pay for startrek.website too. My point what that the Fediverse works just fine when people volunteer their time and money to keep it running. The only reason you would need a subscription is to generate a profit to pay the executives.

      • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        I’m not the one complaining about having to pay for goods and services. If lemmy required a sub I would evaluate it against competing products and make a decision.

        I would not, however, make a post complaining about a company trying to fund its operations.

        • Corgana@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          My point was that the Fediverse works just fine without a subscription, the people upset about a subscription are not upset about the cost, but about what it represents (or more specifically, what it doesn’t).

    • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Maybe it’s time we start restructuring our economy and society to not require everything to have a profit motive?

      • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        I mean ya, sure. I have no particular love for capitalism. That is the economic system we currently exist in though, for better or worse.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Except it is not. Bluesky can decide for itself how much profit to aim for.

          • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Except it is not.

            Lol. It is. We live in a capitalist economy. That’s not up for debate, it’s a fact.

        • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          I just don’t see how a social media site can be healthy/safe AND profitable.

          If it has to make money it’s going to sell user data and force narratives, and the entire argument that it has to make money allows human beings to shrug responsibility for exploiting their userbase.

        • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          Obviously in a non capitalist system our taxes would actually pay for public goods and services.

          We wouldn’t make a social media entity pay their own operating costs if we were intentionally funding it as a public service.

          Just like PBS and NPR.