moonleay@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoDOJ says Google must sell Chrome to crack open its search monopolywww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square166linkfedilinkarrow-up1764arrow-down12
arrow-up1762arrow-down1external-linkDOJ says Google must sell Chrome to crack open its search monopolywww.theverge.commoonleay@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square166linkfedilink
minus-squaredaggermoon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·7 months agoWhat company could actually afford to buy it other than Google, Meta, or Amazon? Unless they are forced to sell it at a loss, which is fine with me.
minus-squareArchRecord@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45arrow-down1·edit-29 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squaregap_betweenus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·7 months agoHow exactly is this company going to make any money?
minus-squareAhismaMiasma@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·7 months agoI assume by continuing to sell data.
minus-squareArchRecord@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-29 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareJasSmith@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down5·7 months agoThe judge would immediately shut that down for creative avoidance. This is an order to sell, not break up. The DOJ specifically indicated behavioural remedies in this case, meaning Google must not remain in control of Chrome.
minus-squareArchRecord@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-29 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareunderwire212@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoDon’t ya love it when people comment saying something that they think must be true as if it were actually true, without having the slightest idea?
minus-squaredriving_crooner@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·7 months agoOracle, sun, tencent, tita…
minus-squarepewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months agooracle would create MANGO (Microsoft,Apple,nvidia,google and Oracle)
minus-squareRadiantprime@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·7 months agoHear me out… Valve
minus-squaredinckel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·7 months agoWith all due respect for Valve, they don’t need this. They exist in their niche, and they’re exceptionally good at doing their work
minus-squareAnd009@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoChromium engine for half life 3
minus-squaredinckel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoValve already use CEF extensively in their client
minus-squarerenegadespork@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 months agoMicrosoft is probably drooling at the prospect. They’ve been trying to get that IE monopoly back since this happened to them.
What company could actually afford to buy it other than Google, Meta, or Amazon? Unless they are forced to sell it at a loss, which is fine with me.
deleted by creator
How exactly is this company going to make any money?
I assume by continuing to sell data.
deleted by creator
The judge would immediately shut that down for creative avoidance. This is an order to sell, not break up. The DOJ specifically indicated behavioural remedies in this case, meaning Google must not remain in control of Chrome.
deleted by creator
Don’t ya love it when people comment saying something that they think must be true as if it were actually true, without having the slightest idea?
Oracle, sun, tencent, tita…
oracle would create MANGO (Microsoft,Apple,nvidia,google and Oracle)
Broadcom
Hear me out… Valve
With all due respect for Valve, they don’t need this. They exist in their niche, and they’re exceptionally good at doing their work
Chromium engine for half life 3
Valve already use CEF extensively in their client
Microsoft is probably drooling at the prospect. They’ve been trying to get that IE monopoly back since this happened to them.
Elon Musk