• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 31st, 2023

help-circle










  • zagaberoo@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml2023-08-09.jpg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is a lack of magnitude order objectively wrong? A date format is ultimately a language feature, and the US format successfully transmits the needed info just fine within its natural context.

    It may seem objective from your perspective, but language is used in many more contexts than those you are familiar with.


  • zagaberoo@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml2023-08-09.jpg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You haven’t explained what is objectively wrong other than you don’t like it. My argument is more than just being used to it, closely matching verbal convention is useful.

    Also, it’s funny that you think I’m arguing either is objectively better than the other.


  • zagaberoo@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml2023-08-09.jpg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only the combination of formats results in ambiguity. Neither format is ambiguous on its own.

    Standardization is good, and if someone were to change it should probably be the US given the apparent worldwide consensus otherwise. That doesn’t make either format good or bad on its own.

    What I take issue with is people acting like the US format is some kind of bizarro nonsense when it in fact makes perfect sense in terms of matching spoken dates. That is hardly a weird basis for a format.

    Each has its tradeoffs, and which set of tradeoffs is better is a subjective matter. I agree that d/m/y makes the most sense for an international standard (if not y/m/d), but to claim that the US format itself is somehow objectively bad is silly.



  • zagaberoo@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml2023-08-09.jpg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not unclear to americans. “Objectively” is hilarious here. If it’s in the format people expect, then it’s perfectly fine in context. Sorry that US traditions don’t suit your fancy.

    It’s definitely confusing in an international context, but well-estsblished conventions don’t change easily.