• 0 Posts
  • 188 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle



  • No.

    Most people will store in their ecosystem (Microsoft or Apple). Lose your device, recover via logging back into your service. That effectively means that logging in to your ecosystem is your “one password”. Of course you can shield that login with a passkey that sits in another instantiation of your account (laptop, home PC).

    The nerds will use a platform-neutral password manager (last pass, 1Password) etc. That is likely to either be protected by a strong password AND a recovery key (to print on paper) OR a passkey stored in your platform ecosystem.

    Personally I’m in 1Password, using a very long passphrase and a recovery key (two print outs, kept in two different locations).

    If you ONLY use one device to enter your ecosystem you do have some risk if it is passkey secured. The end of the chain ought to be a highly secure password that you never reuse anywhere else (your “one” password). Best to go completely random and write it down on paper.

    But the risk of never being able to access your ecosystem are really quite low.



  • I’m right there with you. One of my daughters love drawing and designing clothes and I don’t know what to tell her in terms of the future. Will human designs be more valued? Less valued?

    I’m trying to remain positive; when I went into software my parents barely understood that anyone could make a living of that “toy computer”.

    But I agree; this one feels different. I’m hoping they all feel different to the older folks (me).


  • Argh, after 25 years in tech I am surprised this keeps surprising you.

    We’ve crested for sure. AI isn’t going to solve everything. AI stock will fall. Investor pressure to put AI into everything will subside.

    The we will start looking at AI as a cost benefit analysis. We will start applying it where it makes sense. Things will get optimised. Real profit and long term change will happen over 5-10 years. And afterwards, the utter magical will seem mundane while everyone is chasing the next hype cycle.


  • The difference is that there is SOME accountability in the West and we can, to an extent, influence who leads us, especially in Europe.

    So if flagrant misuse does appear, there’s a much higher risk of it being discovered and of heads rolling in the west.

    Think of the number of exposed scandals in the West and compare that to China.

    And I’m not throwing shit China’s way and thinking the West infallible. I’ve been to China plenty and worked with awesome Chinese people plenty. There’s a lot to love in China.

    But let’s not get lost in whataboutisms. Where would you rather raise your children?!












  • If somebody runs a market hall and allows stalls to be set up where narcotics and CSAM is being sold, and profits from it, and ignores police requests to stop it, I would like something to happen against that person. That person is complicit.

    What I can’t understand is why telegram doesn’t just set up the some moderation systems. Most of their growth surely doesn’t come from drug dealers and pederasts? It feels like it would be a tiny element of it and not worth the hassle.

    I suspect Durov doesn’t like dealing with big teams and can’t be bothered.

    I’m a heavy user of Telegram (average about 1h of screen time every day, and pay for Telegram Premium) entirely because all my friends are on it and that’s because it is the best messaging client BY FAR. I’d love not to share this platform with criminals.

    Since when did fighting crime become a “totalitarian state” thing to do?