r00ty

20 years into the trump dynasty dictatorship, they will still be saying “thanks Biden” to every financial inconvenience.

I wouldn’t even bother replying to comments from hexbear mk II. I just automatically assume troll.

I think it had its uses in the past, specifically if it had the memory backup to prevent full array rebuilds and cached data loss on power failure.

Also at the height of raid controller use (I would say 90s and 2000s) there probably was some compute savings by shifting the work to a dedicated controller.

In modern day, completely agree.

I’m sure I’ve seen paid software that will detect and read data from several popular hardware controllers. Maybe there’s something free that can do the same.

For the future, I’d say that with modern copy on write filesystems, so long as you don’t mind the long rebuild on power failures, software raid is fine for most people.

I found this, which seems to be someone trying to do something similar with a drive array built with an Intel raid controller

https://blog.bramp.net/post/2021/09/12/recovering-a-raid-5-intel-storage-matrix-on-linux-without-the-hardware/

Note, they are using drive images, you should be too.

The OP made clear it was a controller failure or entire system (I read hardware here) failure. Which does complicate things somewhat.

When I made a new linux install I chose Arch. I think for me the reasoning is thus. While I have a LOT of experience with unborking server linux installs, with desktop it’s just a pain to deal with. I previously used Manjaro which, while very easy to install, does obfuscate a lot of what happens behind the scenes. When it goes wrong, personally I found it harder to fix.

With Arch, beyond enough to give me a terminal and basic gnu tools, I’ve chosen what I install from then on. I think that means when things go wrong there’s a much higher chance I’ll know what it is and how to solve it.

Time will tell if this plan works out or not though :P

I mean, if they knew where you usually shop online, probably not. I generally get the popup when either:

1: Shopping somewhere for the first time
2: Certain businesses (presumably those that are more often targeted for fraud I guess?)

I bet if they tried to use a different delivery address (and the shop passed that on) it should (I think at least) trigger a security check.

In shops especially with contactless it’s very unlikely to be stopped though. But I think the bank needs to eat the contactless losses if I remember right. I do recall there’s a maximum number of contactless payments you can make in a given time before it forces chip and pin though.

Yeah, but that’s just because “nobody wants to work”

Well it seems it was more to do with sanctions, if the open letter from one of the chopped developers is to be believed. In which case, I think the right thing is to move the names to contributors (they did still contribute), remove them from maintainers (some maintainers are actually paid by the foundation, I mean not a lot, but some are paid).

I still find it all a little odd. But likely there was a bit of a prod from somewhere higher as to how sanctions should be followed.

Therefore there is either missing information (external pressure to take this action) or this is simply an action based on personal judgement.

Looking at the other post about NVidia drivers, I am starting to wonder if western governments (or perhaps just the US) are going after large orgs and suggesting how current sanctions should be interpreted. In which case, not sure I can then blame the Linux foundation, since you know, you don’t need government heavy breathing down your neck.

Yeah, along with this I am suspecting there’s been a “suggested interpretation” from western governments to large orgs.

And I’ll say the same here as I did above. If it was for security, their code is tainted too. It’s an arbitrary reaction that is not complete as a solution to anything.

If that were true, surely they’d not trust ANY of their existing work, or at least any done since the Special War Operation. Wouldn’t that make sense?

They’ve left the code, and removed the people arbitrarily. Seems a bit off to me.

You know. I don’t like what the Russian leadership and military are doing. I feel like ultimately we’re in the cold war era. But you know, at the height of the cold war, radio operators around the world still worked Russian stations.

Yes, there was a very clear policy, neither side talked about ANYTHING beyond their signal report and working conditions (information about radio, power output and aerial basically). At the height of the actual cold war, the individuals were not cancelled like this.

Sanction the leadership, sanction the money, and sanction the military. But the normal people that are subject to the propaganda? I don’t understand the benefit in doing this. I also don’t see how the sanctions effect an open source project…

Seems a bit weird. Maybe there’s information we’re not privy to, but on the face of it, just based on what we’re seeing. Seems like a very very odd move.

Definitely. And it’s actually “We installed a camera in your bedroom, but it’s hidden, you cannot remove it. It’s enabled but don’t worry it’s not recording”.

I just ideally would like Microsoft to say something. Because at the moment it’s super weird to enable it on PCs that it’s not meant to run on.

There’s been a lot of youtube videos made on the tech side of it. But, like I say they all make a fair point. It’s installed, enabled and hidden. But none of them have shown any evidence of it actually collecting data yet.

This arrived in the 24H2 windows update I think it was about a week ago.

To be clear, I installed a new Linux system totally separate to this and just coincidental, and there’s still some things I need to use Windows for, so it’s not going anywhere soon. But for sure this whole thing is one more reason to be suspicious of Microsoft.

As I said, I am not sure there’s any evidence showing it’s actually doing anything yet. None I’ve seen at least.

But, I think there’s some very suspicious points that stand out to me.

• Installed by default
• Enabled by default
• Hidden from the user unless they specify the feature by name from command line (listing from command line doesn’t include it either). And I wonder if being searchable by name was an accident that will be patched out next time.

If this wasn’t going to be anything to do with the recall functionality that has been previously described, then I feel fairly sure they would have posted an announcement about it by now. Silence in general is a bad thing for this kind of thing in my experience.

But, since it’s not doing anything now I’m more in a “wait and see” stance personally.

I’ve found it very interesting. So far as I can tell it’s installed and enabled (even on non co-pilot PCs). However I have yet to see or hear of anyone that has found evidence that it is actually running and doing its job (capturing screenshots and creating the database for the AI model).

To me, the fact it’s installed and enabled and they’ve not stood up by now and said “Ooops our bad, it was only meant to be on copilot PCs and we should have added it to the features menu so you can turn it off” just suggests that, the stuff is there and at some point they will flip a switch on ALL PCs to enable it.

It’s quite lucky that a week or so ago when I got some new SSDs, I put aside 2TB for a linux boot to replace my old broken previous linux dual boot. Not booted into windows in over a week.

This is exactly what I expected AI to do. Basically if you’re a junior developer your work is likely to be checked by a senior.

Instead they will just have seniors use AI and then check that work instead.

It’s very shortsighted because you only become a senior developer after being a junior and it will turn off new people to the industry.

But, that doesn’t matter to pretty much any large business. They never have a long term strategy (and do not let them have you believe otherwise). They have month, quarter and year only and the importance is in that order except at quarter and year end.

They will destroy their own industry for short term gains and then blame the rest of us when things turn sour.

I’m afraid both.