I evaluate basically all my food with what I call “hotdog math”. my wife hates it. my local gas station sells hotdogs at 2/$1. the free toppings can push the calories count near 550, but I know nothing comes close, so I round down to 500. milk beats oatmilk on hotdog math, and carries a wider diversity of nutrients, to boot.
yes, they are.
it’s not rape. it’s a veterinary procedure
i mean… we’re talking about civil torts here, not constitutional law. i think you can still count on a court to throw this out even with a pro se defense.
no one is raping cows
it’s settled law that you are absolved of responsibility if you don’t moderate.
If it’s ever successfully repealed, you’d become liable for anything posted to your forum
unless you refuse to moderate it. then you are only criminally liable in the circumstances that have been codified, which usually has a takedown grace period.
it’s one reason among many.
I’m not willing to risk that it might be true
trustworthiness is always a matter of opinion.
the post is mostly verifiable information with two sentences of speculation that you seem to think is the crux of what I said, when, in fact, all I said is that routing traffic through Israel dimishes my trust in proton.
it’s not circular logic. if you don’t know, you can just not say things.
I read it when it was published and stashed it for opportunities like this.
the post is the evidence.
the claim isn’t that Israel is hacking proton. the claim is that proton routed traffic through an IDF affiliate.
I did provide evidence. you’re asking for more evidence.
I don’t trust proton. if you think you can trust proton, feel free to use them.
I don’t know how this can be verified, nor does it matter at the point of sale