He got us through the Tech Wars

But how can I do the B if I cannot do the A

I think it’s great that you want to oppose these people, but I think it’s wrong to start using bad faith arguments ourselves to do it

Well that’s an important part of the discussion: it’s not as binary as you want to present it

But in this case, we’re not talking about ‘1%’. Generally, women can go to 35% muscle mass while men can go to 45%. I can imagine it’s a world of difference between fighting someone who has 1% more more muscle than yourself, or 25%.

That’s just because these questions are disingenious at best. The real questions you should ask is why there are different men and women competitions on all levels (answer: to not deny half of the population to meaningfully compete) and where those people that don’t clearly fall into this binary division should enter.

Reminds me I got to go charge some things

You don’t understand. Bad publicity is good publicity.

Or maybe, in this particular case… No publicity.

No publicity is good bad publicity like… Well yeah you might have a point there

Does it change anything if the stereotype is correct

My head canon for sea-based Kaiju is they have a sack

That’s all the explanation I need

Do you know of some special secret law of thermodynamics that prevents us from putting a nuclear bomb in orbit?

We’re replying to a comment that states the US pulled it off 60 years ago

Are you sceptical about the part where Russia can put a satellite into orbit or the part where they can make a nuclear bomb?

Play some RPG’s and it will come to you

VR racing sim

They’re both rights, as spelled out in the Constitution

Because of the implication

You’ll probably be burnt out of all your ambitions by your 30’s

Well, if you want me to prove that some ultra-zionists chased a Palestinian family of their land in the West-Bank today because the latter had genocided them there yesterday, I agree that that is not the case.

But I hope to make you understand that this is still all part of a larger religious conflict. This isn’t something that suddenly started in 1947. Your claim that they were all living happily together until the 1940’s is too broad, and quite wrong.

There are plenty of examples of how jews were discriminated against, small and large, ancient and recent. I agree that in the relatively sparsely populated Palestininan territories themselves, there wasn’t very much enmity. And that was probably one of the reasons the zionist movement chose it.

The first large waves of immigrants came from Russia and Eastern Europe because of the genocidal religious discrimination they faced there. Later those who experienced the same under catholic and islamic majorities, with the nazis taking the crown, followed suit.

And it’s not like the local muslim population welcomed this stream of immigrants. They themselves were expecting to come out of the Ottoman empire, and later Mandatory Palestine, with an islamic Arab state (where they would remain first class citizens). This led to the first larger clashes following WW1 resulting in both sides polarizing and militarizing, and the creation of Haganah and Irgun. And they’re still fighting the same fight today. Was it ‘wrong’ for all those jews to migrate there? Perhaps. Was it ‘wrong’ for the local muslims not to welcome them? Perhaps. But the history isn’t as one sided as you describe it.

You’re conflating and misrepresenting two of the examples I gave. I wonder why.

I gave you the link these examples come from five posts up. If you can’t be bothered to spend five minutes reading that, why are you so invested in this conflict (and discussion)?

Here’s a bonus one to quench your thirst for whataboutism, from the same article:

He compelled them to wear distinguishing garments, with a very noticeable yellow cloth for a head-covering; from that time forward the clothing of the Jews formed an important subject in the legal regulations concerning them.