You’re welcome! You’ll love it. There are tons of Youtube videos about this, btw.

And there are tons of great things you can do with it - for example:

Blend the soft garlic with parmeggiano, spread on slice of ciabatta, sprinkle with cheese, bake until golden brown, sprinkle some garlic oil and parsley. That’s some fantastic garlic bread.

120°C is good. Cook for at least one hour. Add aromatics like thyme or rosemary if you feel like it.

I just prefer a good olive oil. The confit is way better used on pasta that way. But you’re right, rapeseed oil might be a better choice if you don’t want it to solidify.

I always have some emergency garlic confit in the fridge.

Take an ovenproof baking dish, fill with peeled garlic cloves, cover cloves with high quality olive oil. Cover with tin foil. Cook for one hour in oven, low temperature.

Store in glasses. Will keep for weeks. Or months in fridge, although the oil will become solid.

Use it for whatever needs a garlic boost (which is almost everything).

As an IT guy, there will always be a special place in my heart for the awesome person who wrote a protocol suite for this use case (it is a lot of fun to read):

https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2795.txt

Well in that case, if a religious person accuses you that you hate their god, it’s still not true. Because that religious person thinks of their god as a real entity, while you hate their concept of god. The target of that hate is not the same.

That’s as may be, but that’s not the word that was used in the meme.

No atheist hates god. How can you hate something you don’t think exists?

You presented the world of US science as the whole world of science. You pretended just because in America, 50% of scientists are religious, that would mean 50% of scientists in the entire world are religious, which is far from the truth. And you still refuse to accept that this renders your whole argument baseless. So stop wasting my time.

You committed a logical fallacy, were called out on it and now you try to pretend it didn’t happen. Talking to you is futile.

Citing a study about science in the USA, a very religious country, as if that in any way reflected the world of science as a whole… well, okay then.

Even if the judiciary system in your country doesn’t do its work, people taking justice in their own hands is a fundamentally bad thing for a society. I don’t pity predators if they get what they deserve, but I pity the society that suddenly has to define boundaries - where do you draw the line? Not all cases are clear cut. Not everyone operates on the same set of morals.

Example: Religious zealots really do believe that abortions kill children. If society doesn’t categorically forbid people to take justice into their own hands but goes “well, in this case, we can all understand”, you will have other people acting in ways they perceive as equally justifiable. And then abortion doctors get murdered.

The users who downvoted me don’t seem to have this understanding, they would rather have revenge. If you people don’t understand that self-justice will ultimately lead to a more violent society, then go ahead, downvote me again. You’re the reason your country isn’t a more civilized place, wherever you live.

Religion has no reason to argue with science,

Well, that sounds good on paper. It would be nice if over the centuries, religion wouldn’t have ceaselessly attacked and persecuted scientists. If religion was “only philosophy”, there wouldn’t be so many religious zealots not only denying but actively trying to ban the teaching of evolution at schools. Nope… religion is anti-science. It has to be, because science is the one thing that has gradually taken away religion’s authority over the minds of people. Religion is a mind virus, science is the cure.

Is that really the only problem you see with people taking justice into their own hands? Less oversight?

I happily pay for software. ONCE. I have no idea if this software will be regularly updated and if there will be new features. How do we know the developer won’t abandon the project? And it’s a lone developer, apparently. Ever heard of the bus factor? Give me a license that enables me to use the product in its current form indefinitely, and I might consider buying it. But a subscription? No thanks. Who does this guy think he is, frickin Adobe?

I prefer watching three cushion carom. It’s the only game where I can’t usually guess the player’s plans before they play a shot.

Good software, but subscription plans are a deal breaker for me.

If you were a refugee from 9gag like me, you would probably think differently. That place is filled with racist memes.