–Flemming Ramussen, 1988
–Flemming Ramussen, 1988
I used it (some android version of it popped up) when driving to an eventthe other day and the other people were texting as I was on my way. It tried to summarize the entire 9-month conversation not just new messages, and it thought the group chat name - “Bilbo Baggins My Balls” - was just one person talking to me, so it was complete nonsense that completely distracted me while driving. AI strikes again.
appreciate it thanks, I’ll take a look
yes, I can run docker.
if the instrument is that different to the politician why do they both tongue A minor but struggle to hit the double Ds consistently?
the problem is you can’t take those weaknesses and call it “academic” - it’s a contradiction in terms.
When a real academic makes up answers its a problem, when chatgpt does it its part of the expectation.
That would be good if they did that but that is not the intent of the org, the purpose of the tool, the expected or even available outcome.
It’s important to remember this data is not being scraped to make it available or presentable but to make a machine that echos human authography convincingly more convincingly.
On an extremely simplified level, it doesn’t want to answer 1+1=? with “2”, it wants to appear like a human confidently answering an arithmetic question, even if the exchange is “1+1=?” “yes, 2+3 does equal 9”
Obviously it can handle simple sums, this is an illustrative example
I would love a layman’s guide to NGINX. every guide I come across is filled with unexplained jargon
everything that’s ever been in anyone’s mouth is a thing tho 😞
I’ve worked hard in my adult life to stop chewing or putting things in my mouth, but for some reason this looks so good to chew on.
you can certainly try
And a 14 year old kid using a VPN is probably not the target audience for a lot of the worst abuse.
Not saying it won’t happen, but a drastic reduction is better than none.
Yes I was agreeing and adding to your point if that wasn’t clear!
In the uk: arts investment on average returns twice what is put in to it. The problem is this is often non profit funding that is returned back to communities and organizations and not realized as profit and thus people think it’s bad. No, it doubled the money, but then used the money on good shit and didn’t just leave it sitting in a bank to accrue interest. That’s a good thing.
alternative interpretation: it’s only possible to be neither right nor wrong on something when the object is physically impossible
hit me with some brutal recommendations if you got them. it’s been a while and I’m out-of the loop
i imagine the average high street or mall shop uses more plastic in a month than an average common or garden household uses in a year, and it goes up in magnitude from there.
we’ve had acid rain since the 1850s and we still have it today
it’s crazy how there’s no way to play an unplayed Steam game v they should do something about that
You mean how do we not believe in something harder?
The other part of it is there’s not only one monkey who does Hamlet correct on the first attempt, there’s two, three four, guess what - an infinite amount of them.
And another infinity that get it right after 5 minutes
Another infinity that take exactly 10 years 3 months 2 days 3 hours 4 minutes and 17 seconds
And another infinity that takes one second less than the life of the universe
And another infinity that takes a googleplex of the lifetime of the universe to complete
that’s the point of the thought experiment