I mean I use windows and Linux for home and work. I’m happy with a changing ecosystem. The control panel is, often, the best tool to get shit done on windows.

For freedom unit fans he means Celsius . 104f

His idea of work is shit posting on Twitter

Sexuality is a spectrum and feeling attracted to Henry is a common trait.

Curry on chips!

Sure and that sucks but that’s reality

I mean that’s a stupid and childish retort. Congratulations on being the problem. I’m sure I have a fedora to tio in your direction

I did nothing more than pushing a button.

Not on Linux though, you had to do a bunch of fucking about to almost make it flawless.

Dismissing major releases with drm isn’t the victory you think it is. Linux is getting better it’s almost there.

I just press a green button in steam

Autodesk seems to be inconsistent with emulation. I can make fusion 360 run but not other tools.

That’s better but assuming they have a system that can run windows in a VM at native resolution it’s still a broken workflow that won’t attract people to Linux.

Look Linux is my daily driver, my entire lab is Linux. We use a combination of Debian, fedora, and rhel. I’m not opposed to using other distros. It’s okay for working with my peers who are on windows but not the best. Easy enough to work around.

However if an important part of your workflow requires Windows, Adobe, Autodesk, the murky shit of office products, etc., then arguing for dual booting, using a VM , or a different computer isn’t going to win people to Linux. It makes proponents seem silly

How do you play helldiver’s 2 with my friends?

I’m not going to pirate software. Developers deserve a paycheck

Dual booting kinda sucks. It fragments your workflow and it is pretty disruptive compared to just being able to move to whatever you need to move to.

The only reason I have windows is to play games and not all games will work on linux

The reason why gamers pivoted to discord is it was irc, team speak, and Skype in one platform that just worked

I get what you are saying, but we just need men. Socially healthy, well-adjusted men. Especially in early education. Role models matter.

I’m a stem teacher, and I work hard at trying to get more women into stem.

1. More women reduce reduce the number of men but simply increase the number of subjects we teach.
2. More women in stem creates normality and produces more women in stem. When we have open nights women telling women how cool and interesting the subject is excited them.
3. It increases range and capacity, I have tasks that are designed to interest young men. As I started producing content that also interests women we got better and richer tasks.
4. In my teaching area we moderate other teachers courses and every single teacher who whines about women in stem have boring single focused programs
5. Men like courses with women. Especially if those women have similar interests

The no opportunity for males to be exceptional is a dog whistle. Stem is still there for men. There are still high standards.

The problem is a lack of men in teaching roles.

Young men have few, sometimes no, men who act as role models…for example, I get comments from students who love the fact that I have a beard and they like that a teacher is proud to present in one.

Secondly men and women have different skills socialized into them. Guys are better at exams and practical tasks while women are socialized to be better at communicating tasks. As men left education assessments moved from practicals and exams to essays.

Socialized isn’t entirely correct it’s also a lack of focus on the difference between how young men and women develop in primary years which also leads to skill issues

Anyway ranting on my phone sucks. More women in stem, especially in digital technology and engineering is great, women have ideas, they can solve problems, we should learn why engineering is a sausage festival instead of just assuming that it is because men are more exceptional at engineering than women.