Gamer™
I have commited the Num-Code for ™ to muscle memory.
Other interests include bicycles, bread making and DIY. I do own a 3D-printer and adore the Nintendo 3ds.
I choose to believe there is a lot more to the magic object than the truth or it’s own will. It’s a mirror after all, what you see depends on who stands before it. If you ask to see beauty and the reflection shows how you compare to a 14 year old, that’s on you.
Then again, when have these things ever been static. Shrek’s iteration has it’s own will.
Uninformed take. First of, we are working on killing off only a few, malaria carrying Mosquito species in certain regions. Whatever niche they leave will be filled by another, possibly native species of Mosquito.
2nd, nutrient transfer my butt, they carry like 1ml and that’s mostly water. You definitely transfer more nutrients by having some ants in your compost bin.
There are about 2000 wild tiger left, I found this article from 2011 saying that they might be extinct in the wild by 2030.
So there might be 2000 ecological niches for smilodon to fill in 5 years. We better hurry then.
Is fixating on the mammoths here first-world centrism? The article mentions 4 other species that have way better chances. Also, given how far we are from actual wild mammoths, that “it can solve climate change” argument is just wrong the way it’s been presented.
I don’t think this is applicable to backyard aquaponics. You don’t want to include an anaerobic digestion plant in your backyard project.
Either you have no use for the Bio-Gas, or you use more than 10kg of fish can produce.
Actually, it was the train that has come the long way.
It might look like you’re moving when you focus completely on the train, but you are in fact standing still while train spotting.
For the 1915 intended reader, the punchline is that Everett is ill-tempered with an extremely short fuse.
For a 2024 reader, it’s a Tuesday.
…what do you mean, “open-source”?
That physician is a bit out of his field of expertise, isn’t he?
I meant open-carrying compared to concealed carrying, both have similar impacts on gun violence I imagine, while the comic only ridicules open carrying.
It’s also not a part of who they are. Queer people are queer. People who open carry aren’t different when they don’t open carry. It doesn’t change who they are internally if they don’t open carry.
I hope you don’t need me to point out the uncomfortable parallelism here: You can be a lib. owning jackass at home, but don’t be it in public, please conform to societal norms.
Again, it’s not open carrying to make anyone uncomfortable to them, it’s expressing who they are politically. Just that the way they chose to express it is inherently problematic, but nonetheless, personal expression trumps making others uncomfortable.
I’m not sure I follow, you are after all in your right to dress how you see fit even if someone else finds it uncomfortable. Pardon the obvious, but quite a few people are uncomfortable around queer people, and you know damn well the queer should never apologize for that!
I believe open carrying is linked strongly to the identity of these people (but, you know, stupider), the same way people wear anarchist symbols or define themselves as Marxist/Leninists/whatever. They live the “don’t step on me” life. And as long as it stays as a political statement itself, it’s their right.
Open carrying of course has a lot more problems with it than a pride flag on your shirt, but that doesn’t seem to be what the comic is about.
If that is what this comic is about, then why specifically single out open carrying?
All I’m reading here is “How dare people do something I disagree with in public?”.
To be fair, I’m no US American, so I wouldn’t know if open carrying itself is a problem, instead of just being a political statement.
I know, that’s what my “when have these things ever been static” was supposed to express.