Oh sheeeit! I used revanced on Android, but I had no idea there was also a Firefox extension for that. Thanks!
Oh sheeeit! I used revanced on Android, but I had no idea there was also a Firefox extension for that. Thanks!
Not even, though. Practically all the YouTube “creators” these days have [this part of the video is brought to you by scandanavian interwebz to keep out teh hax0rs] sponsored segments that are [Have you shaved your fuckin’ nutsack lately bro? Check out this ball hair trimmer from clipyerjunk dot com] littered throughout [zzzzzzzzzip … ^reecrootah ] their videos.
That being said, some of them at least put effort into finding and vetting content-relevant sponsors that can actually be helpful. I can kinda just barely tolerate those.
I’m 36 and if you want to call me, then fine? Who cares? I don’t get why it’s such a big deal.
Are zoomers really like this?
Who knew Jason Sudeikis had such dramatic chops? I honestly forgot it was even him most of the time.
They can both be problems simultaneously, and it’s disingenuous to argue that there aren’t militant feminists pushing to keep all of the advantages from earlier eras.
I literally pointed out several factors that are objectively institutionally unequal. Pithy quotes won’t change that.
Gender balance in government and business is not a proxy for equality.
Woman are not institutionally prevented from campaigning for office. If they’re not voted in, that’s just democracy.
Women are not institutionally prevented from climbing the corporate ladder. They largely prefer to have a more comfortable work/life balance.
But they are accepted into college 2:1 compared to men.
They do receive scholarships, educational, and career opportunities just for being women.
They do receive an egregiously unfair advantage in family and divorce courts.
Those are institutional.
A story all too common. Someone I know mine got divorced a number of years ago. He’s a fun, charming, kind, decent looking fellow in good shape for his age, and I can’t imagine he did anything to deserve what happened. I don’t know all the details of their divorce, but I know all but one of his children was poisoned against him by his (now ex) wife, and it’s only because the one happened to be away long term at the time.
His ex has several advanced degrees and is more than capable of earning six figures. And yet, he was still ordered to pay her spousal support and a sizable chunk of his pension. The divorce and family court system is absolutely fucked for men and it’s a small wonder so many of them contemplate drastic measures when their lives are ripped away from them.
Feminism gave women all of the same rights and privileges as men and then conveniently “forgot” to balance out all of the exclusive rights women get just for being women.
Mmmmmmnaaaahh. Let’s build apocalypse bunkers and burn this planet to the ground while civilization descends into hunger games.
— obscenely rich fucks everywhere
I’m guessing because it’s sort of an alliteration on lemmy?
I’m still trying to figure out how reddit expects to “become profitable” while simultaneously destroying everything that made it valuable.
Not only that, but their insane demand may not even be possible to comply with unless the user has been active semi-recently.
No, you misunderstand. You’re thinking of DHCP. The parent poster is talking about CGNAT, where hundreds or thousands of customers of an ISP may share the same public-facing IPv4 address. It’s impossible to self-host anything in this scenario, there no way around it and DDNS won’t help you.