There is nothing in the rules as written that prevents it
Edit: forgot i am not in the dnd community
There is nothing in the rules as written that prevents it
Edit: forgot i am not in the dnd community
I highly recommend zsh. It takes a moment to setup initially, but you can use oh-my-zsh to just skip that part and use one of the many, many presets, and it supports plugins, of which there are many. It gives you tab support for so many popular commands, you will never need to remember them, and it has a lot of small improvements that makes your terminal life a breath. For example, if you do cd tab in bash, it will give you a list of subdirrectories. If you do the same in zsh, it will give you that list and a cursor that you can use to navigate said list, so instead of typing the dir, you can do cd tab tab tab enter
I really don’t like how “consumer-friendly” means “GUI that resembles Windows” in the minds of so many people.
Installs Ubuntu.
It is Ubuntu.
Gets angry.
“I’m not using Chrome, I use Brave”.
My brother in christ, you are using chrome with a different color pallet and a different company that sells your data
Do we have !enlightenedcentrism yet?
Tankies aren’t communists, they’re authoritarians with the red aesthetics. They agree with fascists on every valuable part of their worldview, and only disagree on which historical genocidal dictator was totally innocent actually
So why are you opposed to the universal healthcare?
Then show me. I don’t want to derail you, so show me the best one you think of and let’s analyze it.
I hope you do, because no good peer-reviewed studies ever produced the results you are talking about. I urge you to show me which ones you are talking about.
And you should learn to look closer. Maybe get more that a couple of words out of headline, you know, how scientificly minded people are suppose to be.
Absolutely not true, it has zero physical effect on the body.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL96to_4NYU Here, for more information
Also, in order to have fire you need heat, and water is wonderful at absolving and dissipating heat.
if construction does not tear up
It’s München time
For me it doesn’t allow to login
Yeah, it gives smug sense of superiority, “look how cool I am, seeing through the world, the only intelligent person on the planet”
No, but you see, accounts from lemmigrad with names like communistcat and 12315123 and vasya69 are telling me that both parties are the same therefore I should stop voting ever, and in the interest of believing both sides, I will do what they tell me.
The enonomy was centrally planned
That’s the difference between state capitalism and the regular one. In the regular capitalism, the means of production are controlled by the capital holders, by the rich few. In state capitalism the means of production are controlled by the state, but the rest stays the same, people work for money, the results of their labour gets sold on a market of some sorts, and the surplus value is gathered by the stakeholders. Corporations in state capitalism consist of natural monopolies/oligopolies, which makes the market non-free by default, which makes everything else kinda fall apart, but it doesn’t make it not capitalism, it makes it end-stage capitalism from the beginning. For the vast majority of the USSR existence that was the case.
the urge to conclude this comes
from the desire to use words by their meaning. I am not talking about why USSR was what it was, I am only talking about what it was. It wasn’t socialism, because the main characteristic of socialism is that the means of production are collectively owned by the workers, and the means of productions in USSR were owned and operated exclusively by the state which consisted on unelected elites. It wasn’t communism, the main characteristic of that is that it’s moneyless classless society that distributes the goods based on needs, and in USSR there were social classes, there was an exchange of goods and services for money, and although there was no privately owned means of production, the amount of goods a person could receive was dependent on how much work they contribute, not on how much they need.
Economically, the USSR was a form of state capitalism, and politically it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And no matter how much they said that the ultimate goal of a country is to transition to a communism (and believe me I know how much they did it, I had to endure it in school), I don’t see any moment at which it really happened.
We could argue a lot about who declared whom an enemy, what were economical implications of the most brutal war in history, and what was the reason for the inhumane treatment of the soviet citizens by their own rulers, and is it really evil to starve to death millions of people if it means that the steel production will be a bit better, and based on your comment I assume you have a lot of strong opinions about that. But ultimately that will not be a debate about the economical structure.
Russia was never even close to starting to try to attempt communism. There was some aesthetics, but it was state capitalism economically, and dictatorship politically. Not a lot changed.
Floating disk