1·
5 months agoHow about a basic Squarespace business website?
I looked at a bunch of options before and Wordpress seemed like one of the most promising: https://lemmy.world/post/12989654
- 5 Posts
- 21 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 15th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
2·8 months agoDoesn’t that mean that docker containers use up much more resources since you’re installing numerous instances & versions of each program like mumble and leftpad?
Doesn’t that mean that docker containers use up much more resources since you’re installing numerous instances & versions of each program like PHP?
It seems like docker would be heavy on resources since it installs & runs everything (mysql, nginx, etc.) numerous times (once for each container), instead of once globally. Is that wrong?
Instead of setting up one nginx for multiple sites you run one nginx per site and have the settings for that as part of the site repository.
Doesn’t that require a lot of resources since you’re running (mysql, nginx, etc.) numerous times (once for each container), instead of once globally?
Or, per your comment below:
Since the base image is static, and config is per container, one image can be used to run multiple containers. So if you have a postgres image, you can run many containers on that image. And specify different config for each instance.
You’d only have two instances of postgres, for example, one for all docker containers and one global/server-wide? Still, that doubles the resources used no?
It seems like docker would be heavy on resources since it installs & runs everything (mysql, nginx, etc.) numerous times (once for each container), instead of once globally. Is that wrong?
1·8 months agoI covered that in the OP. It requires coding ability for anything other than a simple blog.
I covered that in the links in the OP. It’s extremely limited. I didn’t find it useful.
Redline the cheapest option until it catches fire.
It’s an important business website that would have severe consequences if it went down during traffic spikes (which it does get).
Why are you worried about your site going down during traffic surge? Unless you’re running a critical service, there is no need to worry about this too much if it’s just your personal sites.
Because it’s an important business website that would have severe consequences if it went down during traffic spikes (which it does get).
With proper caching, your personal site can even tank traffics from reddit frontpage on a $5/mo vps.
Yeah, I’m using Cloudflare, and I saw that Wordpress has a built-in caching option, but I couldn’t find any info on how well that protects sites from traffic surges.
consider hosting it on platforms with autoscaling support such as netlify.
Yeah but I need an SSG with the same capabilities as Squarespace to do that, and as mentioned in the OP, that doesn’t seem to exist.
I’d recommend Statamic
I looked at the demo and it looks like a very simple text editor to make blogs.
Since you posted this into a self-hosting community…
I have two other websites hosted on a $5 Hetzner server (that counts as self-hosted right?). I’ve been considering adding a Wordpress, Grav, or static site to it. But as mentioned in the OP, I have to worry about the site going down if it gets a traffic surge, so I’m thinking it would be safer and similarly/more affordable to host a Wordpress site with Hostinger or GreenGeeks. Am I wrong?
Grab a Raspberry Pi, slap nginx proxy manager and ddclient into it, and point your domain to your home IP.
I’m not likely to do that, for multiple reasons.
It was a firewall issue. I disabled my firewall and it works.
Nginx is running in a container
I don’t think it is. On my other machine it’s running in the docker container, but not this one.
Using serverIP:5870 has the same result as using listmonk.mysite.com:5870. It loads a broken page https://i.stack.imgur.com/gIy4A.jpg with broken links. IE: the URLs are
http://localhost:9000/subscription/form.
Thanks, I checked out your link. I think my most recent comment below answers some of your questions. https://lemmy.world/comment/5586470
Are you able to access listmonk directly without the reverse proxy? What is the URL I. The browser when you do that?
Besides the info I put in the OP, I’m not sure what else you’re asking.
LAN IP address of the docker host
No idea what this is, so I looked it up https://www.howtogeek.com/devops/how-to-get-a-docker-containers-ip-address-from-the-host/ and ran
docker psthen put the container ID at the end of thisdocker inspect -f '{{range.NetworkSettings.Networks}}{{.IPAddress}}{{end}}' docker-container-ID. It output an IP address which I used forproxy_pass http://docker-IP:5870;, restarted nginx, and nothing seems to have changed.
Thanks! I was using 127.0.0.1 because that’s what other people were successfully using: https://github.com/knadh/listmonk/issues/1590#issuecomment-1812399067. I had tried variations of
proxy_pass http://app:5870;because I’m running listmonk successfully on another server usingproxy_pass http://app:9000;, but that is when nginx is running from inside the docker container:services: db: <<: *db-defaults container_name: listmonk_db volumes: - type: volume source: listmonk-data target: /var/lib/postgresql/data app: <<: *app-defaults container_name: listmonk_app depends_on: - db volumes: - ./config.toml:/listmonk/config.toml - ./listmonk/uploads:/listmonk/uploads nginx: image: nginx:mainline-alpine restart: unless-stopped ports: - "80:80" - "443:443" volumes: - ./data/nginx:/etc/nginx/conf.d - ./data/certbot/conf:/etc/letsencrypt - ./data/certbot/www:/var/www/certbot networks: - listmonk depends_on: - app command: "/bin/sh -c 'while :; do sleep 6h & wait $${!}; nginx -s reload; done & nginx -g \"daemon off;\"'" certbot: image: certbot/certbot restart: unless-stopped container_name: certbot volumes: - ./data/certbot/conf:/etc/letsencrypt - ./data/certbot/www:/var/www/certbot networks: - listmonk depends_on: - nginx entrypoint: "/bin/sh -c 'trap exit TERM; while :; do certbot renew; sleep 12h & wait $${!}; done;'"I forgot to try
proxy_pass http://listmonk_app:5870;though. I just tried that and I got the same error that I get withproxy_pass http://app:5870;.Job for nginx.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status nginx.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.systemctl status nginx.service ● nginx.service - Centmin Mod NGINX Server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nginx.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) Drop-In: /etc/systemd/system/nginx.service.d └─failure-restart.conf, openfileslimit.conf Active: failed (Result: start-limit) since Sun 2023-11-26 01:07:52 UTC; 1min 57s ago Process: 34289 ExecStop=/bin/sh -c /bin/kill -s TERM $(/bin/cat /usr/local/nginx/logs/nginx.pid) (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Process: 18426 ExecReload=/bin/sh -c /bin/kill -s HUP $(/bin/cat /usr/local/nginx/logs/nginx.pid) (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Process: 25700 ExecStart=/usr/local/sbin/nginx -c /usr/local/nginx/conf/nginx.conf (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Process: 34339 ExecStartPre=/usr/local/sbin/nginx -t (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Main PID: 25702 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Nov 26 01:07:47 centos7test systemd[1]: nginx.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1 Nov 26 01:07:47 centos7test systemd[1]: Failed to start Centmin Mod NGINX Server. Nov 26 01:07:47 centos7test systemd[1]: Unit nginx.service entered failed state. Nov 26 01:07:47 centos7test systemd[1]: nginx.service failed. Nov 26 01:07:52 centos7test systemd[1]: nginx.service holdoff time over, scheduling restart. Nov 26 01:07:52 centos7test systemd[1]: Stopped Centmin Mod NGINX Server. Nov 26 01:07:52 centos7test systemd[1]: start request repeated too quickly for nginx.service Nov 26 01:07:52 centos7test systemd[1]: Failed to start Centmin Mod NGINX Server. Nov 26 01:07:52 centos7test systemd[1]: Unit nginx.service entered failed state. Nov 26 01:07:52 centos7test systemd[1]: nginx.service failed.journalctl -xe -- -- The result is timeout. Nov 26 01:08:56 centos7test systemd[1]: Dependency failed for /mnt/HC_Volume_33691542. -- Subject: Unit mnt-HC_Volume_33691542.mount has failed -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel -- -- Unit mnt-HC_Volume_33691542.mount has failed. -- -- The result is dependency. Nov 26 01:08:56 centos7test systemd[1]: Job mnt-HC_Volume_33691542.mount/start failed with result 'dependency'. Nov 26 01:08:56 centos7test systemd[1]: Job dev-disk-by\x2did-scsi\x2d0HC_Volume_33691542.device/start failed with result 'timeout'. Nov 26 01:09:01 centos7test systemd[1]: Started Session 313 of user root. -- Subject: Unit session-313.scope has finished start-up -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel -- -- Unit session-313.scope has finished starting up. -- -- The start-up result is done. Nov 26 01:09:01 centos7test CROND[34567]: (root) CMD (/usr/lib64/sa/sa1 1 1) Nov 26 01:09:10 centos7test kernel: Firewall: *TCP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=85.203.42.26 DST= LEN Nov 26 01:09:35 centos7test kernel: Firewall: *TCP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=205.185.121.3 DST= LE Nov 26 01:09:45 centos7test kernel: Firewall: *TCP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=107.148.82.29 DST= LE Nov 26 01:09:53 centos7test kernel: Firewall: *TCP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=62.204.41.118 DST= LE Nov 26 01:10:01 centos7test systemd[1]: Started Session 314 of user root. -- Subject: Unit session-314.scope has finished start-up -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel -- -- Unit session-314.scope has finished starting up. -- -- The start-up result is done. Nov 26 01:10:01 centos7test systemd[1]: Started Session 315 of user root. -- Subject: Unit session-315.scope has finished start-up -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel -- -- Unit session-315.scope has finished starting up. -- -- The start-up result is done. Nov 26 01:10:01 centos7test CROND[34680]: (root) CMD (/usr/lib64/sa/sa1 1 1) Nov 26 01:10:01 centos7test CROND[34679]: (root) CMD (/usr/lib64/sa/sa1 1 1) Nov 26 01:10:11 centos7test kernel: Firewall: *TCP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=91.92.246.145 DST= LE Nov 26 01:10:12 centos7test kernel: Firewall: *TCP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=85.203.42.26 DST= LEN Nov 26 01:10:21 centos7test kernel: Firewall: *TCP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=85.209.11.142 DST= LE Nov 26 01:10:22 centos7test sshd[34734]: Received disconnect from 180.101.88.196 port 14758:11: [preauth] Nov 26 01:10:22 centos7test sshd[34734]: Disconnected from 180.101.88.196 port 14758 [preauth] Nov 26 01:10:40 centos7test kernel: Firewall: *TCP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC= SRC=162.216.150.164 DST= lines 1377-1425/1425 (END)
I tried some of the solutions here https://serverfault.com/questions/351212/nginx-redirects-to-port-8080-when-accessing-url-without-slash
proxy_set_header Host $host:$server_port;didn’t seem to change anything.I also tried
proxy_pass http://listmonk.example.com:5870/; proxy_redirect http://listmonk.example.com:5870/ http://listmonk.example.com/;Maybe this https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30097334/nodejs-on-nginx-not-working-without-a-port-number-in-the-url is the answer, but I don’t understand it.
I ran into a similar problem with snapshots of a forum and email server – if there are scheduled emails when you take the snapshot they get sent out again if you create a new test server from the snapshot. And similarly for the forum.
I’m not sure what the solution is either. The emails are sent via an SMTP so it’s not as simple as disabling email (ports, firewall, etc.) on the new test server.