There was a dude who posted like 3 pics of his totally wrecked car on Facebook.

He then got the “memories” reel with a catchy melody and the same 3 pictures of the fucked up car rotating in and out.

That’d imply that my take is equally unhinged when it’s the default thing that happens when an animal bites someone and might have been carrying rabies.

Then there is no point in talking to you. What they did was 100% justified and that’s the end of the discussion.

So what that humans can carry rabies? Do you see a difference between a human and a squirrel or not?

You miss the fact that they confiscated it, then it bit someone, then they tested it for rabies.

Because it is a wild animal that can carry rabies.

The way it played out is the squirrel bit someone. The only way to check for rabies and be 100% certain is to cut the brain. Which obviously doesn’t lead to the animal being alive anymore. But at the end of the day, a squirrel’s life is less important than that of a human, so it had to be done.

You’re plainly trolling.

Not just “thinks”, he is counting on it. Weaponising the hate people have for him. He gets his shit kicked in and it’ll go viral.

Yeah because it doesn’t need to set and is ready to dig up quickly and doesn’t break off. Concrete would probably lose a bunch of paths when they’re digging it out.

I get it on mobile. I think it does it with playlists. I launch some music for background noise and it stops after a while.

Other features I guess. Like the bullcrap “are you still watching” that pops up every three videos, music maybe. I’m thinking of some waiting room TV thing, but then again you don’t want ads in that usecase either.

I think this is always the case. Buying cool shit usually costs a bunch of money. And people who get a shitload of it while young, often buy that stuff too - nobody calls them out for having a midlife crisis then

Cool, I can say I have billions of dollars, and that makes it true then. Look at the actions, not what they say.

Harris wasn’t pro ceasfire in Gaza, please stop gaslighting people.

Kscar

The decision they made wasn’t a precedent, they allowed it as a case-by-case basis. So Biden wouldn’t be able to point to Trump and say “he did it! So it’s legal!”.

An assassination isn’t “an official act”, plain and simple. The Supreme Court ruled on one specific case. They allowed it then. A different case could be ruled illegal. Which it would 100% be done, be it a republican court, a democratic court, or some magical unbiased one from fairy land.

The Supreme Court does, they just said that

Not true, the Supreme Court decides it on a case by case basis. And murder of a political opponent would land Biden in jail faster than you can say “one Missisipi”. And rightfully so. That’s why he didn’t do anything of the sort - because he is not a criminal.

No it isn’t and it never was.