That was always the joke but some people prefer in-joles (i.e. already knowing they have identical faces) over being inclusive and showing the joke at face value. I can appreciate both, depending on finesse.
This joke doesn’t really have any finesse so my vote is for inclusivity.
With this as a guide, it would be enough if the task needed to be done twice per day to break even after five years.
That’s why you never ever write the filename manually. Always copy paste it!
Starbucks isn’t Italian, for one.
You would have to pay off the 250 k debt though, if you want to keep the house. You can’t give the house away without paying the debt first.
The one inheriting the house may want to take a 250k loan to afford that 300k house.
Interesting typo. Almost like a Freudian slip but with melting batteries instead.
“Never install, carry or handle”. OK but what are they for then?
I guess that wouldn’t help the deaf people though. (:
I just wanted to add about the stares. Photos back then required the target to be very still ao they are just probably trying their best to keep still.
Most photos of children failed because they moved. These were very still, hence the tension in their eyes, or just a lucky shot. Anyways, photos from way back always look like death for this reason.
Maybe competitors are only up to 200 per year and these guys finally achieved 300 per year?
You got it wrong. The spouse did mrry who they wanted, it’s just not who OP is. The lesson should be “be yourself” not “Don’t get married because then you can’t be yourself”.
That’s not true at all, mathematically. That’s why we have a measurement for co-variance or correlation. If two dimensions are 100 correlation, they can most definitely be reduced to one.
Agreed but someone actually tried it - did the research.
That’s just what we call people spending some time to figure something out. Security research is basically just trying to learn the technology and then trying to break it.
Vespucci is awesome. I’ve used it extensively for years. It’s only for editing though, not for navigation. I use OsmAnd (free pro features on f-droid)
The resolved ones get removed so the harder and harder notes remain. The main obstacle is usully that someone needs to actually go to the location, take notes and edit the map. It’s a lot of work.
No thanks. It’s way more fun to be part of the decision process. If a manager can anticipate all of the requirements and quirks of the project before it even starts, it’s probably going to be a really boring, vanilla project at which point it’s probably just better to but the software.ä somewhere else.
Creating something new is an art in itself. Why would you not want to be a part of that?
Also: Isn’t it cheating to compare the two approaches when one of them is defined as having all the planning “outside” of the project scope? I would bet that the statistics in this report disregard ll those projects that died in the planning phase, leaving only the almost completed, easy project to succeed at a high rate.
It would be interesting to also compare the time/resources spent before each project died. My hunch is that for failed agile project, less total investment has been made before killing it off, as compared to front loading all of that project planning before the decision is made not to continue.
Complementary to this, I also think that Agile can have a tendency to keep alive projects that should have failed on the planning stage. “We do things not because they are easy, but we thought they would be easy”. Underestimating happens for all project but for Agile, there should be a higher tendency to keep going because “we’re almost done”, forever.
Plus, the news of this would already be priced into the stock, so if anything the price is already low and these companies would need to pivot their business (which would increase the value again) or die (which would lower the price marginally, to zero). Either way, shorting is a bad strategy in this case.
To rephrase: I would not spend 30 minutes listening to ads in order to save 30 minutes of spare time. Probably even less because ads are very disruptive to me, wasting more precious time.
It’s still too easy to install apps. You xan just type a parent’s password on the kid’s device to continue.