They want more data and literally can’t store it efficiently enough. You can read their eula and see, they instantly own anything you upload and you no longer have rights to it, which is absolutely bonkers and pretty dubious in many countries if this is even legal. We found out when they overviewed the security of our studio and we use other communication software now because of it. They could literally argue that they own the assets to the games we make if we send concepts to each other.

That they don’t collect as much user data is not enshittification. That is when greed kills it. They have been greedy a long time but not being able to hoard as much free user data is a good thing

Nice! They get less free identity data an own less copyright

It’s probably because it’s their property now and personal data is precious

No it’s not

Next issue

What people say that? I have never heard anyone have that belief except if I stretch it, in astroturfing ads. Nobody believes that. Corporations decide. They are not humans. You are not controlled by humans but by huge devil machines

Nice, take away the only tool that sometimes fixes what your engineers destroyed

Ofc they just look in their database if this is something it has ever said and to who

You mean prostitute

I just love that almost anyone can participate in hacking language models. It just shows how good natural language is as a programming language, and is a great way to explain how useful these things can be when used correctly

I once did an anecdote

Poor you

Yep, those are the moves that can all be easily calculated very quickly on modern hardware

It’s incompetent plot by a company not even interested in what they are selling

You can calculate all possible moves in milliseconds on any silicone these dsys

It’s not wrong

Yeah, the hysteria is definitely the problem. Can’t say that I agree that the technology is underwhelming, though. It can generate, practically anything fast and with guidance and it’s just interesting that nobody really understands how. It’s a paradigm shift for creative work. Producing music or art will continue to change a lot from this. Using the technology to analyse personalities during job interviews is so fundamentally idiotic, because a generative system is a brainstorming tool, not analytical nor accurate. And just so wrong that it feels like it’s actually the work of someone malicious.

I don’t understand why anyone writing, reading or commenting on this think a bookshelf would not change the outcome? Like what do you people think these ml models are, human brains? Are we still not below even the first layer of understanding?

It’s like telling your water to not run down the drain

The aliens, we covered this