Minus the violence, yeah I’m with ya

And I will look upon their debt, multiple part time jobs, and falling apart rental and nod.

Yep. I’m focused on looking after my community/friends who have targets on their back now.

Other than that I look to republicans and say “alright, this is all you now. Better be perfect!” They shouted and screeched that their way was best. Their god is in the seat. Time to deliver a “great economy”

Humanity big word

Is multifaceted to big a word for you? Lol

The world runs on contacts, and those dollars were spent around the globe. There are examples of what you say, with mali considering reclaiming ml. Nationalization can have a chilling effect on industry, but depending on your affiliations this isn’t really an issue

A fair point indeed, but that’s not how it is. Public dollars were funneled one-way into private infra, in many cases.

“it seems so backwards”

They set the shit up, so they decided the behaviors.

Because they prop up the infra to support them right?

Funny thing here on Lemmy…

Totally.

TRICK OR treat. The candy might be bad, the porch might be scary. It was about the experience, not just shoveling in 4000 calories of your favorite candy.

Now we’re talking

Your last sentence is great.

Regarding the prior stuff, that’s very “you specific”. There’s of course tons of caveats or gotchas to my broad statement, but it doesn’t make it untrue.

Biometrics present a less secure access path to a device…

Sure, as conversation, i’ve heard of thieves face unlocking phones they just stole.

Indeed running as sterile an every day phone as possible is another great security approach by reducing risk.

If you don’t succeed in lockdown before seizure, or aren’t conscious, your biometrics can be used without your consent.

Taking reasonable steps to improve your security doesn’t mean all efforts are all or nothing

Never use biometrics on devices, security/privacy risk

Are you ready for the terries to get froggy?

https://youtu.be/eiWIOKKuyGE?si=27PLlihXQlsugfdL

As clarification, the hunting and consuming of conscious sentient beings is pretty clearly not vegan. Eating something increases its suffering.

If the human does not want to be eaten, doing so (aside from after their natural death) is a hunt

Edit to be most clear, I meant isn’t a core tenant not eating things USING their sentience, when you have caloric alternatives. If it died naturally it’s just a hunk of meat

Uh isn’t a core point of veganism to not consume things with sentience?

Even an “evil” human has sentience and doesn’t wish to be eaten. (Unless they do, and in that case, crank that hog)

It’s the country named in the article lmao