Funny how Congress “can’t just legislate over SCOTUS” but only when it’s an issue of human rights. Corporate rights or Capital interests? BULLDOZE THAT DECISION BABYYYY

By peons*

Totally fine when they do it.

I’d argue those people were necessary, what with how public opinion works.

If we’re in a tug of war and you’re pulling with 10 pounds of force, I can’t beat you with 2 pounds of force. In context, you won’t beat “ITLL MAKE YOU GO BLIND AND KILL YOU” with “heeey, like, jot always, maaaannnnn.”

As always, reality is somewhere in the middle, but we wouldn’t have had the progress we did without the other extreme being loud and out there.

All is legal in the eyes of capital.

Same as it ever was 🤷‍♂️

Get to it then. 🤷‍♂️

I got a nice LG C3 on an open box deal, I connected it to run updates and fiddle for a few, then deleted the apps and took it offline.

“BuT eVeRyOnE iS oN tWitTeR”

And will continue to be so long as everyone keeps showing Elon there is NOTHING he can do, say, or allow that will get people to leave.

Meanwhile, everybody will continue to refuse to leave the platform, further showing Elon that there is no price too high for people.

I had a similarly nightmarish experience with Asus over their phone some years ago. I was a long time Asus fan in the PC sphere, now none of my tech is ASUS.

The American consumers worship of convenience/price above all else is precisely what got us here. Just like how everyone discusses how toxic twitter is… On Twitter.

In regards to twitter - Of course it’s where everyone is, nobody will leave.

In regards to Amazon - Of course everyone else is struggling, nobody will pay $3 more to buy it from them instead of Amazon.

I’m not saying there aren’t times it does end up having to be amazon or that you can’t be lazy and use amazon occasionally. I have prime myself and do use it on occasion (probably wouldn’t if I didn’t split it with my ex though.) I AM saying nothing will ever change so long as people REFUSE to even consider their habits for a second.

That makes alot of sense, but also makes me feel extra old. So do me a favor and GET OFF MY LAWN 🤣

They always fucked with my stomach, it was weird. Only brand that messed with me like that. 🤷‍♂️

Obligatory “glad I quit” statement lol

I always imagine people who die on this hill just admiring the title screen of every game in their library for 5 seconds and calling it a gaming session lol.

Oh fuck off already, nobody cares.

Do we have an iamverysmart community? We could use one.

You’re quick to imply that this study is bullshit, yet offer no counter argument except “believing statistics is for losers lul”

So where are your sources to refute the article?

I don’t think it’ll be that easy. Once people have to pay (or the functionality is reduced to compensate) there are plenty of alternatives waiting to provide better products for the same price if not better. The Google singularity depends on being a whole suite of premium product being offered for free, once that’s gone it won’t have the same oomph as a brand.

How do you feel about Musk owning Twitter? Because that’s (depressingly) considered important to free speech, but the “free speech” crowd happens to cheer as Brosef openly censors things he doesn’t like and promotes baseless falsehoods and whatever else tickles his whims. I don’t want to assume you’re in that camp, but 9 out of 10 “Keep govt out of my free speech” folk tend to celebrate Musk’s particular brand of it and consider it “free speech” when he censors but oppression if it’s done to somebody who agrees with them.

Do you think search would be free and open under the ownership of some private equity group or another billionaire with money to burn like Musk? Hell, do you think it’s free and open NOW under Alphabet? They play dirty ALLLLLL the fucking time with search. If we brought Google (or some other search engine, or hell built a new one) under a government team we could just…pay the engineering team to build and maintain a product without all the games of profit and clout chasing that gives you relevant results instead of specifically engineered middling results designed explicitly to make you have to run another search (and all the other crap they do.)

Google has, Google isn’t the only tech company.

Google also wouldn’t survive being broken up. Their entire business model revolves around the strangleholds they have. Somebody would absolutely pick up the search product if it went under and I’d rather it be public than owned by another Musk who will just decide that only fox news and breitbart can be displayed on the first few pages.

Some things SHOULD be publicly owned, in everybody’s best interests.

I said what I said. Properly fund shit and put people in charge that understand it instead of politically charged appointees.

Big tech has done nothing but hemmorage money and make everything worse, why are you celebrating them instead of calling it busted when they do it?

On today’s episode of “underfund government agencies so we can argue govt doesnt work and privatization is bae”