I see your problem.

You don’t believe people when they tell you who they are. You imagine their actions and their beliefs to be separate from the individual even though they are the beliefs and actions of the individual. Your idealism doesn’t reflect reality.

This isn’t an argument, it’s a fact. The only way to not be part of the social contract is to remove yourself from society, including all of societies infrastructure. You are obligated to support and work within the rules of the society you are a part of. If you object on moral reasons then you can make your attempts to change your society or which society you are part of through whatever means you have access to.

You were never apart from society so you are bound by the social contract by default, failure to uphold the social contract will result in the following violence: being put in the corner, being told ‘no’, spanking, detention, suspension, loss of employment, physical violence, police arrest, incarceration, garnishing of wages, loss of access to social services, etc.

Disingenuous

You don’t seem to be in a state of mind for willing absorbtion of information.

Hear me out. Transposable character arcs. Write your character arcs separate from the characters personality so that you can transpose the roles to any character that takes the groups interests on the fly. This way literally any NPC can be the “big bad” depending on who the party gravitates towards while giving them a legitimate facade that the players won’t expect.

This can also make it more fun for you as you now have to roll play the character arc with a random character.

Serfs gonna serf.

You should slap your father for not having the common decency to wipe you on the curtains.

I’m almost 40 and sometimes I feel like the only thing I can identify as is a dick. So I try to put that to use for the benefit of others, be a dick to an asshole, save a pussy.

))<>((

Unless it comes from the anorexia region of France it’s just sparkling weight loss.

It’s because ultimately we all value ‘strength’ (of varying sorts) over ‘weakness’. We are still far from socially internalising “strength is being able to show weakness”, because in part you need to be strong to deal with the expected pushback of being OK with being ‘weak’.

Time to earn your red wings, boys.

Society advances one conservative funeral at a time.

This meme is straight bussin’, on god, fr fr.

Trash belongs in the bin.

Thank you.

Eh, offence is taken, don’t take offence from people who’s opinions don’t deserve your respect.

Reddit vs Their Product (feat. Customers, Contributers, Moderators, Advertisers)

How stupid a person is doesn’t change how correct an objectively correct statement is irrelevant of if you “trust them as a source”. Just like how smart you are doesn’t change that you’ve made an objectively incorrect statement. Fox news can still give you the correct time of day even if you wouldn’t respect their opinion on how hot it is.

Who said anything about a boycott? Do you just regurgitate shit you heard elsewhere without understanding the context of it?