The research you linked has a clear conflict of interest in the funding source.
ArmokGoB: ArmokGoB
The research you linked has a clear conflict of interest in the funding source.
If it’s like that stuff then they didn’t invent it.
GODLZ’ILLIA
California stopped being nice when regular dudes started getting priced out. Now it feels like it’s all tech bros, rich people, and homeless people.
Read “fornicates” like a Greek hero
Your initial claim was that MLMs “steal” content to train on, which is plainly false. If MLM training data is theft, then piracy is theft. All this hate should be directed at the legal system that punishes individuals for piracy while enabling corporations to do the same.
I like how you completely dodge his argument with this. If training data isn’t considered transformative, then it’s copyright infringement, like piracy.
I bought my friend a blue deck consisting of 30 persistent petitioners and 30 islands.
I feel like this should work the opposite way: if you can’t keep the genome pure, the crossbred plants aren’t covered by the patent.
The AI doesn’t need creativity because the “A” in “AI” stands for “artificial,” not “autonomous.” It’s a tool. Someone is controlling the output by setting the input parameters.
But the theft in my opinion is that a minority control this nascent tech, based on existing capital, and most of that ‘venture capital bro’ money funding this was made off of platforms that became wildly profitable for them from humans that were doing this. But now this is going to displace them and create no more need for them.
So the problem is capitalism, not AI.
Furred creatures also tend to be featherless.
O, no right
I focus on the non-bitter flavors.
Here’s my simple solution: be unable to operate a car.
I still don’t get Ohio
It’s got nothing in it
Is cat meat any good? I doubt you could get much meat off of one, but still…
They would have to be total fools to write anything other than that; they’re not going to admit their research has a conflict of interest. Their statement that their funding source didn’t affect their research outcomes is worth about as much as a pinkie promise.