• shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    So you mean they want windows to have something that Linux has had for 20 years? Android has also had this since ~2017 too.

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I love linux and been using it for decades, personally and professionally, but no, linux doesn’t have “hot patching” the same way as that article describes it. At most it can live patch the kernel (and only few distros actually use that), but definitely not for the last 20 years, and definitely not running processes. However, it does usually restart background processes after an update without requiring a reboot, but in my experience, often times the system becomes unstable after several such updates and rebooting is effectively necessary (though not forced, and that’s why I like it).

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Windows doesn’t force you to do anything. You can reboot or not reboot, or skip updates altogether.

        • ilmagico@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Windows lets you pause updates for some time, maybe a week or so, after that you’re going to take them whether you like it or not. Granted, you had a week or so to prepare, so it’s ok to some extent, but don’t tell me Windows doesn’t force you…