• underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I cannot conceive of a task where a humanoid robot would be better suited than just a robot built for the task without trying to mimic a human form.

    • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Minimal investment. A purpose-built robotic production line is incredibly expensive and can onl- do what it was designed for. Theoretically, using these robots requires no alterations to the existing facilities, allowing mercedes to trial them with very low risk and comparably low losses if things don’t work out.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, but if the task is multi purpose, humanoid form makes it possible for it to fit where humans fit and use human tools etc…

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah but the article says the only thing these ones are gonna do is deliver parts which is probably overkill for the likely expense for the kind of sophistication necessary to imitate even a fraction of a human worker’s versatility. To say nothing about the difficulty involved in adapting them to various tasks without reprogramming or training.

  • pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This really sucks for many disabled people who rely on ‘low skill, repetitive’ jobs to survive. I hope Mercedes addresses this (I doubt, given how capitalists hate disabled people).

    • Meansalladknifehands@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think disabled people should get money from the state, they’ve already been delt a bad hand in life, they shouldn’t have to do repetitive tasks for survival. I don’t know how it is in Germany but where I live disabled people get benefits so they don’t have to work to survive.

  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Mercedes also better support UBI so that these workers who will lose their jobs to automation don’t starve to death.

    • VonReposti@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      While I still support UBI, last time robots replaced people doing repetitive tasks, people did find other jobs. Actually there was much bigger unemployment in Britain where the auto industry crumbled since they couldn’t compete with the rest of the world using robots.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        People work their bodies into breaking in these kinds of jobs, which I just find ethically wrong. I get that there are risks with every job, but basically being guaranteed to get injuries from repetitive motions etc. is a big ask. I support robots taking over such tasks.

        I also don’t think it’s a hot take that Mercedes (and fucking everyone) should support UBI. Everyone has a right to live, and if we must have this capitalistic society, then everyone should have some means of access to it. No one chooses to be born, but once they are we as a society have a responsibility to ensure that they can live their lives with dignity.

        If companies want to partake in society, they better contribute to it as well.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Low skill” tasks, huh? So I guess they’ll be replacing the CEOs first, eh?