• Guy Fleegman@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You’re not wrong, but man the Prime Directive would make a whole lot more sense if it did. The commonly misunderstood version of the PD that is intended to prevent cultural contamination is clear and simple. Given its status as the literal top rule, the actual PD—a generalized non-interventionism/pro-isolationism dictum—is oddly complex, vague, and lacking a focused objective.

    • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still want the story of the one mousey, overworked lieutenant junior grade whose job it is to follow-up on all prime directive violations.

      Investigator: Alright, Captain, let’s begin, shall we? Apparently you and your crew intervened in a labour dispute between two independent worlds, and taught the previously exploited civilization about unions, and now their entire social development has radically shifted. Is there anything in that basic statement you’d like to dispute?
      Captain: Uh…when did this happen?
      Investigator: Stardate 43012.7.
      Captain: That was eight months ago!
      Investigator: Correct. I’ve had an entire backlog to work my way through, and this is the earliest I was able to address your situation.
      Captain: Five months ago my entire ship was trapped in a time vortex and we all deaged to adolescence.
      Investigator: …I did think you looked rather young.
      Captain: We don’t even have any memory of those events, but it does sound pretty dope. Surely you can’t hold us responsible for actions we haven’t yet committed, and might not actually commit if we were put into similar circumstances again.