• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    People do use them as nouns. For example, in statistical/scientific context: “Among males/females…”, or outside: “I’m a male”

    And I certainly saw the word “males” being commonly used, which is pretty much why I’m so baffled by the need to banish its counterpart.

    Incels may call women whatever, but actively banishing the word because it was appropriated by some group of weirdos isn’t gonna help - rather, it will only deepen the flawed interpretation of a very regular and normal word, assigning context to where there was none.

    I’m a proud male. Why can’t there be a proud female? This only means she is a woman, after all.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The language of scientific literature is not the same as the language of everyday use. There’s a reason grad programs have entire courses dedicated to scientific communication.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I am a grad student, and I often wish we wouldn’t make too much distinction. It’s just creating problems out of thin air.

    • PussButton@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I do wonder what you’re proud of exactly, when you’re proud to be male. Proud of the genitals you were assigned at birth?

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Nope, not proud as in “yay I’m so happy to be male”. Proud as in “I’m a male and there’s nothing bad about it or the wording around it, I’m happy to be who I am without shitting on anyone being different”