• JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    How would you feel if you invited a few people to your home and then found out one of them secretly recorded audio the entire time? That’s the equivalent of screenshotting messages in a small group chat.

    Unless you were literally planning crimes, the actual content of the conversation is irrelevant to the principle.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      If, in my home me and my friends are sharing sensitive info about past relationships and other actions that can embarrass or hurt people, then exposing that is for the best. I mean where is the limit, if you’re invited to a chat where they’re massively racist and sexist, do you think that deserves to be exposed or do you just keep everyone’s dirty secrets no matter what?

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        idk i’d probably leave, and if anybody ever asked me about i’d say i didn’t like it. If i saw concerning behavior i would probably de-associate from those specific people. Not grenade an entire friend group over it, that’s extra.

        It’s not my place to manage friend group politics.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Doing literally nothing when you see shitty behavior is almost as bad as the shitty behavior itself. Stop letting people you know get away with being pieces of shit - call them out. Ignoring it simply enables more people to ignore it, and the behavior slowly becomes more and more socially acceptable.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          If I see concerning behavior, I feel the need to say something because it’s concerning. More girls will be embarrassed, more people could be exploited, it’s not ok. I feel like seeing that, knowing you can do something, and choosing not to is pretty close to condoning it. It’s not about friend group politics; there are people outside the friend group who are being passed around in that without their knowledge or consent, and that’s not ok. I wouldn’t care if it was just guys with dark memes.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Using your same metaphor, if you came to another person’s house and all they did was shit on their family, and then make dark jokes about killing them - is it all fun and games until something bad happens?

      There are lines. You don’t know what Derek saw.

      But apparently it was so bad that a lot of people are really disgusted at the core group.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        that’s true, but judging by this thread people are also really sensitive about this kind of shit, so it wouldn’t take very much for people to get pissed off like this.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, I’m one of those people. I have this apparently strange sensitivity to people sharing intimate photos of others without their consent or knowledge. Feels very exploitative. I’m just one of those people who doesn’t like to sit back and let people hurt others like that for the lols of a group chat.

            • Lightor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Sorry, compromising photos and messages if we want to be pedantic. If you’re nit picking the nuance ls of the type of private content shared without someone’s consent you’ve already lost.

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                intimate photos implies, sexting, which is, a crime, according to people here. So yes, the semantics do matter :)

                If you’re nit picking the nuance ls of the type of private content shared without someone’s consent you’ve already lost.

                that’s my problem though, i can’t tell you what it is. Was it bad for them to do that? Probably? Does my opinion of them change if it was harmless shitposting between friends, vs genuinely talking behind the backs of various people for no discernable reason. Yes. But we don’t know that.

                Unfortunately I am not god, and do not make the rules, so i cannot control what justice is and isn’t done.

                • Lightor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Well read the post again. One girl was furious that raunchy texts were shared. Looks like we’ve solved the mystery lol.

                  But I’m not out here making a legal argument. I’m saying sharing that stuff without consent isn’t OK, morally. You don’t have to be god to look at something like that and have the guts to say something.

                  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Well read the post again. One girl was furious that raunchy texts were shared. Looks like we’ve solved the mystery lol.

                    yeah, that implies shit like “im so horny i wanna fuck you right now” not literal nudes.

                    though yes, sharing things without consent is definitely immoral, or unethical. It’s hard to argue otherwise. Even in the case of derek.

    • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Flip side: how would you feel if you shared your most vulnerable, intimate moments with one trusted person, only to realise that you’ve been recorded, shared around and commented on in a group chat full of acquaintances?

      Can you see how Derek just delivered karmic justice?

      • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m not saying it’s not awful, but I still think that publicly telling everyone is inappropriate. Derek basically did the same thing as them.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          So it’s okay for the group to bully people, but not for Derek to expose it? Weird line, definitely a red flag…

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        yeah but half of those were previously recorded, the worst thing in that chat is probably the text messages from the one dude specifically. Maybe making fun of people behind their back? But it really depends on how that went down, could be primarily for venting it’s hard to say without having concrete examples. So i’m giving the benefit of the doubt on that one.