• AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Copyright is a good idea. It was just stretched beyond all reasonable expectations. Copyright should work like Patents. 15 years. You get one, and only one, 15 year extension. At either the 15 or 30 year mark, the work enters the public domain.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This more closely aligns with my perspective, although I also believe no work should be able to be covered by both copyright and patent (e.g. software).

      I’m even willing to give longer terms as long as they are limited by the lifespan of the living sentient creator, and not subject to legal games around corporate personhood.

      But, I can certainly see the motivations behind eliminating copyright entirely.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Absolutely, copyright or patent, not both. Though if, and only if, they function identically in duration, I wouldn’t see the downside of having both other than additional expenses actually filing for both

    • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Lightly edited copy paste of my response elsewhere:

      Creation’s are not that of only the individual creator, they come from a common progress, culture, and history. When individual creator’s copyright their works and their works become a major part of common culture they slice up culture for themselves, dictating how it may be used against the wishes of the masses. Desiring this makes them unworthy of having any cultural control IMO. They become just as much of an authoritarian as a lord, landlord, or capitalist.

      In fact, I’d go so far as to say that copyright also harms individual creators once culture has been carved up: Producing brand new stories inevitably are in some way derivative of previous existing works so because they are locked out of the existing IP unless they sign a deal with the devil they’re usually doomed to failure due to no ability to have a grip on cultural relevance.

      Now, desiring the ability to make a living being an individual creator? That’s completely reasonable. Copyright is not the solution however.