shderz@sh.itjust.works to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoHistory repeatssh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down115
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1external-linkHistory repeatssh.itjust.worksshderz@sh.itjust.works to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-squarekopasz7@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-25 days agoThat’s curiously a lot of text for someone not caring. The scientific process is not harmful. If that’s your conclusion then welp. What’s harmful is the blind belief in science. It is skepticism and exploration that brings new understanding. But just because we label something science it can still be quack. And it’s easy for you to dismiss old science because you have the current age’s perspective. Evaluate each era on its own terms. And once again science does work, otherwise we wouldnt pursue it. But the zelous blind faith in science is unscientific to say the least.
That’s curiously a lot of text for someone not caring.
The scientific process is not harmful. If that’s your conclusion then welp.
What’s harmful is the blind belief in science. It is skepticism and exploration that brings new understanding.
But just because we label something science it can still be quack.
And it’s easy for you to dismiss old science because you have the current age’s perspective.
Evaluate each era on its own terms.
And once again science does work, otherwise we wouldnt pursue it. But the zelous blind faith in science is unscientific to say the least.