• joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Like I thought, you’re misunderstanding what you’re reading.

    Yes current recycling processes can lose 4% of the material. But that’s not because they aren’t recoverable, that’s because it’s not currently financially feasible to recover it all.

    And that’s just the recycling part. For someone suggesting that I should read better you sure aren’t great at reading either. So I’ll ask it again.

    What part of the metal atoms degrade as part of them being used in batteries?

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Like I thought, you’re misunderstanding what you’re reading.

      Like I thought, you have nothing meaningful to say. I won’t waste further time with you.

      • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        What? You’re the one claiming that various metals aren’t infinitely recyclable.

        It’s true that not all metals are, but many of them are (iron, aluminum, lithium to name a few) infinitely recyclable.

        Current recycling technology doesn’t really matter as it can and will improve with time as the brand new industry scales up.

        I’m just here pointing out that your statements are false. That doesn’t need to be meaningful to you if you have no interest in learning, but it’s useful for other people who are reading this thread wondering why you’re being downvoted.