• jdeath@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        they so so fucking intolerably slow to get any amount of information out of. useless for sharing any information

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep. I like both. But if I want the gist of something fast or am not in an environment or situation I can sit and watch without disturbing or being disturbed by others. I want text. No fiddling with a progress bar to get back to where I was. Quick easy done. At home I’ll watch videos all day. But it will never be as efficient.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep.

      I do plenty of audiobooks for longer form content, where I know I want all of it. But I absolutely have no interest in having 10 paragraphs turned into a 10 minute video.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Says the text based article😅… Load of shit. There’s little I despise more than someone making a video of something that could have been two lines of text or hell, 20 lines of text. Video can be such an expressive medium, stop shitting on the format by using inappropriatly. If anything the pendulum has already swung way too far towards video and hopefully things will rationalize soon. When I have to watch some dumb video, I put captions on and usually just read the captions. Wish there was a tool for YouTube that just extracted whole caption transcripts so I didn’t even need to play the videos.

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you click “see more” in the description, there is a transcription! It’s still kinda pain im the ass, but allows getting through it faster…it’s not perfect tho.

      Also. Captions and 2x speed ftw.

    • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      There is a tool like this and I’ve used it. But I forgot about it until now and it only got what was available, an automatic translation too bad to even laugh at. But it should be possible to find it. Dunno, YouTube caption download or something like this should do the trick.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Paywall, so I’m just going to respond to the title’s premise.

    Video is relatively new, sure, but it will never replace text. The two supplement each other, and that’s been the case since YouTube first came out.

    TikTok exists, but so did Vine, until it didn’t. What’s on the rise (again) is podcasts. Meanwhile, text has existed for thousands of years and continues to exist alongside video and audio. So I don’t think text is going anywhere, and what little I could read of the article sounds like someone experiencing the Dunning-Kruger Effect and confirmation bias who hasn’t actually done any historical or anthropological research.

    Sounds about right for someone terminally on TikTok.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Plus, there’s something to be said for efficiency. Text takes up very little disk space, where video takes up a lot of disk space. I hear of people that use like a terabyte worth of data per month on their internet connections. And personally, I can’t even get over 100 gigs, even with downloading books and watching some YouTube(99% audio only).

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Video is relatively new, sure, but it will never replace text

      The problem is that, for most people, it has. They’re not willing to read.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        And that’s the claim I’m rejecting. I think it’s confirmation bias, not a fact that stems from evidence.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I see it daily with most people I interact with in multiple, varied communities (and no, I don’t and refuse to use those platforms, because video content is shit).

          They will not read two paragraphs of text. They will happily spend hours churning through junk short videos.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I get it. That’s still confirmation bias, because in comparison, the people that I’m around read often. Our individual experiences are not good ways to determine what people in general are doing.

            • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s not what confirmation bias means. Confirmation bias has absolutely nothing to do with sample size or what you’re exposed to.

              It’s ignoring the evidence you see in order to prop up a pre-existing belief.

    • True@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just a life hack for this article and other websites as welll: Disable JavaScript.