• LeTak@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chrome was not always based on chromeium. Chrome was based on Apple WebKit until 2013 when they forked WebKit and made the Blink engine.

      • Dapado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Chromium was still the base before the WebKit/Blink fork. Chrome and Chromium were released simultaneously in 2008.

      • fidodo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Chromium has always existed. Originally it was wrapping web kit and later they forked web kit into blink and diverged from Web kit. Chromium is a level above the engine.

      • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wha- hold up… I’m not sure I understand…

        Chrome was based on WebKit?

        I’m not aware about the old stuff as much so if someone could fill me in…

        • Dapado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          WebKit is a rendering engine which is one of the major components of a web browser. Chrome/Chromium was released in 2008 using a modified version of WebKit as its rendering engine. Eventually in 2013 they created a fork of WebKit called Blink, which is the current rendering engine for Chrome/Chromium.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Opera was the shit back in the early days. It could pretend to be any other browser.

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pre-Chromium Edge wasn’t even that bad. Sure, the engine had its issues and there was probably a bit of Edge-specific JS on some websites, but I’m sure they would’ve eventually got there.

      But seeing that even Microsoft abandoned making their own browser engine, it goes to show how complex it is to make one nowadays and with new web APIs/features coming out every few weeks it feels like, it’s almost impossible to keep up.

      • TAG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But seeing that even Microsoft abandoned making their own browser engine, it goes to show how complex it is to make one nowadays and with new web APIs/features coming out every few weeks it feels like, it’s almost impossible to keep up.

        No, Microsoft is just historically bad at making browsers. It was not until Internet Explorer 7 that they finally implemented HTML 4 and CSS 2 without major glaring bugs.

    • Espi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have an installer for Opera 12.18, the last one to use their Presto engine. Every once in a while I test it out to see how it has aged.

      It’s not pretty haha. It barely works.

      • persolb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love it in theory… but it just broke so many websites I needed to use. And not always in obvious ways.

      • vii@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can use Ublock Origin in advanced mode, which allows you to block, blacklist/whitelist scripts.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        IMO any of the forks are inherently weaker than the main and there’s nothing stopping you from making Firefox work exactly like whichever flavor of fork you prefer, but with security updates the day they come out.

    • Mikina@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Add-ons are a pretty huge security risk, though. Someone was just posting an article about how tempting it is to sell out with your extension, and how many offers you actually get.

      And I’ve already been burned once, and it’s not pretty. Also nothing you can do against this.

      The best solution is actually not Firefox, but Mullvad. No need for extensions, based on Tor Browser and can be bundled with a VPN that’s full of other people using the same browser - so you have exactly the same fingerprint, and they can’t tell you apart. Not by extensions, not by IP.

  • AncientBlueberry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google accounts for some 80%+ of Mozilla’s revenue. Firefox struck a different kind of deal with the devil than chromium browsers, but Google is the one pulling the strings.

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see that as an okay compromise. Anyone who cares will also know how to change it easily.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            And I actually wouldn’t have a problem with using google for searches if it weren’t for the fact they constantly do the captcha thing when I’m connecting via VPN. Captchas for a simple google search.

            I’m not against google making money off of a good product, but they’ve enshittified it too much to be considered good now.

  • Gamey@feddit.rocks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just wish Mozilla didn’t just tread Gecko as part of Firefox, the few who tried developing on it came to the conclusion that it’s not sustainable if the engines developer doesn’t give a fuck about you! :/

      • Gamey@feddit.rocks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, they always did it like that and basically cut all their bigger projects in the massive layoff so I wish they did too but I doubt it :/

  • lewegee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Be sure to install AdNauseam on your Firefox to really go full “fuck you” to google.

    • arglebargle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      AdNauseam

      Note that AdNauseam no longer recommends Firefox

      Sigh. I believe this is simply because of the removal from Firefox mobile

    • Mikina@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, if you have properly set up Firefox, i.e with arkenfox user.js or by using Librewolf, it doesn’t work :/ It still blocks adds without issues, but it’s not visiting them.

      Or if you’re running PiHole - same issue. Is there a way how to make PiHole actually go though all those clicks? I guess it would be hard to figure out what’s an ad and what’s telemetry.

      • Unforeseen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        PiHole is doing DNS resolution only, it doesn’t have any way to know what the link is, its not sent that data.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I use Vivaldi at work. I love it.

      It’s not on my personal devices, but if work is going to default to Chrome anyway, I may as well be using the best version of it.

      • Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I went whole hog. The sync features are great between computer and phone app (phone app is excellent!) and they actively disable all the terrible shit from chrome. It works with bing/chat gpt too which is nice. They have been very vocal against Google proposed changes and I’m confident they will work around them if at all possible. If not, hell yeah, I’m jumping ship, but I give Vivaldi a lot of credit for what they’ve done this far. I’m hanging in there for now.

    • Objects in Space@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tried FF the other day instead of Vivaldi and I was like, no scroll wheel to switch tabs? No quick commands? No workspaces? Ugh I am prepared to keep using a chromium engine rather than give up all the “power user” features. It’s just sooo good.

      Been using gestures for so long I constantly catch myself using them in other apps where it doesn’t work and getting frustrated at myself.

    • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      We wanted HTML as complex as Adobe Flash. When we got it, the standard became so complex no way smaller players that didn’t dedicate massive resources to keeping up could possibly keep up.

      There was just no way to keep presto up to date with the ever evolving web without a massive new source of income for Opera.

    • Kata1yst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So just use it in a tab of Firefox? I literally had no idea of an electron version of Foundry until this instant.

  • hi_its_me@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Honest question… I get that Chrome has a bunch questionable privacy practices that sends data back to Google, but do the chromium based browsers do that as well? My understanding is that Chromium is just the rendering engine. How is it bad?

    Also, if Google implements their bullshit DRM features, I wonder if the derivative browsers will be able to disable it. I believe I saw that Brave said they won’t use it.

      • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Up to date chromium is 100% just as bad. Forked and selectively maintained version (like brave) aren’t 100% just as bad, but varying degrees well below up to maybe even slightly above this hypothetical 100% marker. Not advocating for Brave (I don’t personally use it), but the way they update is my main point here.

        Not all of chromium’s constituent components are required for a functional browser. At the end of the day, Firefox is just easier to trust and better supported than any of the chromium forks, personal opinion.

  • K Vinayak @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m watching The Spiffing Brit’s exploit live stream right now. Firefox cannot handle that. Edge can. On linux

    interesting

    Update: Alright. Fine! Its probably extension issue

      • mihnt@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just checked it out. Seems that The Spiffing Brit is trying to break youtube or something and is having people open as many tabs of his livestream as they can to get as many views as they can.

        • Nora@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just checked it out. And to test, I opened 15 tabs in firefox and refreshed. Just fine lol. Not sure what problem that person has besides maybe too many firefox extensions.

          • mihnt@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I did the same and RAM usage on went up 20% for me. Using flatpak Firefox if that makes a difference. It’s still responsive though as I type this comment.

      • K Vinayak @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firefox Ram usage just kept going up during that stream for some reason. It was using 6GB of 8GB ram. Edge stayed at 2GB. The stream got boring after a while tho

          • K Vinayak @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its probably the emote extension. He has like 20k live viewers and no slow mode, all spamming emotes and random text