Godric@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoThe Chad English Gammon:lemmy.worldimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1376arrow-down126
arrow-up1350arrow-down1imageThe Chad English Gammon:lemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squarevext01@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down3·1 year agoI think it was intentional
minus-squareEmpathicVagrant@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 year agoShortened to “shouldnt’ve”, for those somehow still confused by this.
minus-squareChais@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 year agoWouldn’t it technically be “shouldn’t’ve?”
minus-squareEmpathicVagrant@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoYES! Thank you for the correction.
minus-squareTragicNotCute@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoYes, that’s that’s issue with this sentence.
minus-squareAJT@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down3·1 year agoWhat is the point in jokes with some people
*shouldn’t have"
I think it was intentional
Shortened to “shouldnt’ve”, for those somehow still confused by this.
Wouldn’t it technically be “shouldn’t’ve?”
YES! Thank you for the correction.
Yes, that’s that’s issue with this sentence.
Oy Wot?
What is the point in jokes with some people