cross-posted from: https://yiffit.net/post/1072752

For a moment, it seemed like the streaming apps were the things that could save us from the hegemony of cable TV—a system where you had to pay for a ton of stuff you didn’t want to watch so you could see the handful of things you were actually interested in.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/K4EIh

  • rich@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I cancelled all my subscriptions and just pay for a seedbox instead.

    Only two subscriptions I have now are Spotify and Game Pass…because they are actually worth it.

    • anemoia_one@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even Spotify though continues to Jack their prices with no extra benefit. I’ve hoped for lossless audio from them for so long, but instead they just charge more for a bad UI driven by engagement instead of user experience

      • Temple Square@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t mind Spotify increasing.

        Inflation is real. And nobody wants to see the service turn into a Little Caesars “$5 Hot N Ready” pizza that erodes in quality, rather than gradually price increase with inflation.

        The advantage we have with music streamers is that nearly ALL the content is on ALL the services. So, if one service goes bananas with pricing, we can jump ship to a cheaper one.

        But TV is siloed into mini monopolies. The only source of capitalism competition they face is use choosing to do without. And frankly, if I’m gonna be forced-fed ads, I choose to do it on YouTube which costs me $0 and not $7.99 a month.

        Netflix is gone. And as someone who leaves The Simpsons running 24/7 on Disney+, I’m frankly getting thiiiiiiiiiis close to dumping their asses, too!

        • christophski@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Spotify increased the price of everybody’s subscription by £1/$1. They have some 200 million subscribers. That’s at a minimum an extra $200m a month. Is that really necessary?

          • anemoia_one@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The thing is, I would totally pay more for lossless audio on Spotify, but they didn’t give me that option. They just increased their price without any benefit to their service. And their CarPlay integration is horrid. I can pick a song on tidal and it plays instantly without issue. With Spotify I have to open the app and play it from my phone and even then it only works like half the time. I’ve been a Spotify customer since they first launched in the US but there’s now no reason to keep my subscription

      • tommy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Try switching to apple music. It is cheaper and the quality is way better. UI is also waaaaay better than spotify’s. Also, I learned that if you dont have any money on your card connected to google play store apple music will be just fine for extra month. So you can use apple music 2 months for price of one month.

        • anemoia_one@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for the recco! Though I’ve actually been using Tidal for the last few months because they’re one of the few lossless audio services, just annoyed because I was a Spotify customer for years waiting for lossless and instead they bumped prices without improving their services

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My boss pays for my spotify and my google opinion award pay for my disney+. That’s all the subscriptions I have

      • rich@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s, in layman’s terms, server space you rent out and can use for your downloads. torrent clients like transmission are usually built in. I pay £5 a month for 2tb space and enough bandwidth to keep a good ratio.

        So instead of downloading to my pc, I download torrents to the seedbox (at a blazing fast speed) and then download files from there to my pc whenever I feel like it, again at stupid good speeds.

        I have FTP access, so I’ve just added it as a folder/mounted drive on my windows and Linux mint file explorers. Works great. Also have it on my smart TV as a web address for quick streaming of whatever I downloaded.

        Edit: this also eliminates the risk of downloading Torrents locally.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s basically a web based software that handles the download of torrents for you and then offers a download link for you to get it on your machine

        • TiphaineRupa@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wait, aren’t seed boxes just VMs that run on the infrastructure of some internet hoster that doesn’t give a crap about the users utilizing it for torrenting? But AFAIK on most seed boxes the user needs to configure the VMs themselves to some degree. So it acts as some beefed up proxy server to torrent stuff without you compromising your own ip address + you have access to high bandwidths and some tb of storage to store your downloaded stuff

          • pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It depends, you can rent an already set-up server/VM just for torrenting and related purposes, but of course nothing prevents you from setting it up in any VM wherever you rent. Just know that some providers that don’t explicitly offer a seedbox for purposes of unknown legality will not appreciate it and may terminate the lease.

        • pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, more precisely it’s a piece of hardware, and it remotely manages torrenting whatever you want, and then you can securely download it wherever you are using the software part

    • Parculis Marcilus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, in the case of Spotify, I’ve ady lost all my faith on the music industry and remain on the sea for a while now. I rather take times to listen to the music instead of giving even a quid to those mf.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Same for me. Had Netflix and Prime.
      Cancelled Prime. Student plan ran out and wanted to spend less (on Amazon and buying random stuff.
      Cancelled Netflix. Didn’t use it, convinced my mother to let it go (only after saying how much it costs).

      Renting a seedbox for 15€ per month, Spotify for music and since this month I burried my life long hate for YT premium and now also have that (and wish for a plan without yt music for 3-4€ less).
      Reason why I did YT premium was, because I already watched more YT than Netflix anyway. And it’s near daily for about 2-3h. Well worth it (for way too much money).

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I absolutely loved the idea of Game Pass. I had it for two years. I actually stopped buying Steam games.

      I was annoyed of their whole file structure (like it’s extremely difficult to move saves from a PC Game Pass game to a Steam/Epic Game). It’s using some weird Windows DRM and has constant connection issues with the Microsoft server. But the value was good and I accepted that hiccup.

      After the Steam Deck dropped, I quit PC Game Pass.

      As a busy parent, Steam Deck is way too convenient and the future of PC gaming is portability. And once the Steam Deck reaches critical mass, if PC Game Pass isn’t on there, it’ll be the Bing of gaming and play second fiddle.

    • gk99@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have Disney+ for Marvel and Star Wars, $4 Google Play rent or theater watch everything else because I’m not a big TV/Movie guy.

      Had Gamepass Ultimate, dropped them when they shut down the family plan, raised the price of Ultimate by $2/mo, cut the value of gold-to-ult conversion pretty significantly, and ditched the monthly games in favor of a perpetual list of games I mostly already own.

      My new preferred plan is PS+ Premium+PC Gamepass, in part because the game offerings on PS+ are actually pretty good, but also because I realized that I can very sustainably get PC Gamepass from Microsoft Rewards. They have an auto-redeem plan with a low enough point value that, if I were to do nothing except the daily Bing/Edge searches, I’d rack up enough points for the next month in 25 days. That’s pretty significant for something I can mostly do sitting on the shitter.