TLDR:

Current ad free plans for Disney+ and Hulu are now raising $3 more on October 12. Both becoming $13.99 and $17.99.

  • RoxActually@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yet another example of how the streaming model is a scam. Disney also wants to ban password sharing like Netflix did. The sooner you can get away from services like this the better. Instead of forking over a fortune for all these streaming sites, it makes way more sense to invest in owning the media you consume.

    • mishimaenjoyer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      streaming hit the wall the moment every corp wanted to make their own service to cut out netflix. the boom in streaming happend - at least in most parts of europe - because basically everything anyone wanted (even some hbo titles) had been on netflix for 10 eurobucks a month and now you have to sub at least three services for almost thrice the price each. and especially disney+ is complete trash if you’re not a marvel/star wars stockholm syndrome victim. now asking for even more in times of inflation and recession is a slap into the face of subscribers.

      • hogart@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People forget families have children who wants cartoons. Which makes it even worse because it’s hard to cut off services.

        • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s funny how we managed to survive without streaming services. I distinctly remember teaching my kids how to rewind a vcr tape. They watched the same Barney episode about 400 times per day. Guess kids nowadays can’t handle that.

          • mishimaenjoyer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            it’s funny how the “when we were kids, whe didn’t even had a tv at home and we were happy”-routine from our grandparents moved up to “we watched the same episode on vhs on repeat!” now millennials are getting older.

            • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean at least my parents had rabbit ears… kinda cruel to force a kid to rewatch Barney when PBS has been accessible over the air to 95% of people for like the last few decades.

                • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I just don’t understand why you would rewatch something 500 times when you get hot barney straight off the press back then… it was even super easy to watch barney later, you just pressed the red button and recorded over the tape.

                  And if one even bothered to read the manual, you could usually preset recording times on most devices. Although shows also had this weird habit of being offset by ad hoc commercial inserts or unplanned interruptions. So it wasn’t super uncommon on most channels (PBS was actually a bit of an exception, due to lack of ads) to be off a few minutes from schedule.

                  The 90s were neat.

            • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Even at a young age they have their own freewill. I forced nothing, merely provided them the tools, which was my point. You don’t have to have a subscription to a streaming service to keep a child entertained.

              • poppy@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think some people have not had much interaction with young kids. Sometimes they only want to watch one. single. thing. over and over and over and over again.

    • sparklecherryz@geddit.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Current streaming has messed up the popularity of legal cord cutting. There’s no real difference in cable and streaming anymore.

    • th3dogcow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s all very well, but in some regions like Australia, Disney has or has announced the end of DVD and Blu-ray sales, which sucks.

    • AndreyAsimow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was not a big surprise that Disney will follow Netflix as in prohibiting password sharing. It is better for the corp of each viewer has their own account.

      I gave up on streaming services and now using Stremio and justchill.

      All in one streaming services in the palm of my hand.

      • El_Rocha@lm.put.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, the Netflix password sharing crackdown was a vote put on the users to decide if it’s a good thing to do or not.

        And it appears that the results are good, since they are reporting subscriber growth and more revenue. Now every other service will follow because, otherwise, they’d just be wasting untapped profits.

        I don’t like this profit maximization companies are trying to do, but one thing is clear: people prefer to pay more for the extra convenience than to stand their ground in their principals.

        Even if people like us stand our ground, most won’t even care (I can see it in my personal relationships as well).

          • El_Rocha@lm.put.tf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, and in cases where there is a monopoly or quasi-monopoly of a product it becomes really exploitative.

            But in this case in particular, I’m gonna have to say it’s the fault of the users.

            They chose to pay more for a worst product that had already been declining in quality steadily, when there are tons of other streaming services with good content.

            • AndreyAsimow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I guess that is the fault of not being aware of alternatives, or brand royalty.

              Average Users just want to be comfortable with watch they already have and don’t want to hassle to learn new habits.

              Disney simply chose to skip the voting and went straight to forbid password sharing. They are hoping for gaining new customers like Netflix .

          • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            And that is why we need a new corporate contract where the betterment of its employees, communities and it’s services/products is a corporations goal not endless growth for the sake of profit.

            • AndreyAsimow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Unfortunately they are pushed by the investors to focus on generating profit for them.

              If I would give money to someone to make more money. I would expect more and more not less or a fix amount.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s just still relatively cheap. I don’t know anyone who has more than 4 streaming services (although I am sure there are some) at once concurrently, that’s still cheaper than the average cable bill ($83).

          • El_Rocha@lm.put.tf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Still, if you were sharing with 3 friends before, it’s a 4x price spike for you.

    • jherazob@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Last i saw, the physical media version of their recent shows came with a box and a code to get it online, not actual discs, so they’re effectively getting out of the business of letting you own your media

    • IIOrochiII@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean it is better to have them offline at least nothing gets in your way when watching

    • Hobbes@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m about to set sail. Streaming is only convenient and cost effective until it isn’t. They are headed for the isn’t pretty rapidly.