• Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Give me a small 4dr sedan with crank windows, manual mirrors, pleather seats, tape player, shitty heat/ac, room for just 4 ppl (barely) and electric for $12-15k. They will fly off the shelves.

    Instead let’s build 7 passenger SUVs with a massive ass IPad, that drives itself into other cars, and fetch key fobs.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s due to battery prices. You can’t pay $25,000 for a battery, put it in a shitbox and sell it for $30,000 because nobody’s going to buy a $30,000 car with the features and quality of a $5,000 car. Batteries can only be maybe a third of the cost of a car, so everyone’s been targeting the top of the market with expensive EVs.

      The good news is, battery prices are continuing to plummet each year. When you have $2,000 batteries, $12,000 cars are doable.

      • Chriswild@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bullshit. You can easily get a battery for less than $25,000. The Tesla model 3 is a 50KWh pack and is $14000 to replace and likely costs way less to make.

        If you were really skilled you could buy 50KWh worth of cells for less than $10000.

        The reason the batteries are more is because you have SUVs and Trucks that need twice the amount of cells for about the same range because they’re not aerodynamic

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Give me a small 4dr sedan with crank windows, manual mirrors, pleather seats, tape player, shitty heat/ac, room for just 4 ppl (barely) and electric for $12-15k. They will fly off the shelves.

      I don’t think they will though. At least in the US. I currently drive the gas version of this vehicle, a 5 speed Ford Fiesta, and the majority of other drivers on the road seem offended that I’m there with them. I set my cruise control ~7mph over the speed limit everywhere I go (almost all highway driving) and I’ll have people speed up when I switch lanes to go around them because they had been driving slower than me for miles previously. I’m used to seeing nothing but bro-dozer oversized grills out of my rear hatch window. Police could just use me as a mobile speed trap for all the people who feel the need to zoom around me despite always going just below the ‘probably won’t get pulled over’ speed. When I’m turning left at a light and I need to end up in the right-most lane I have to switch quickly to keep the person behind me from flooring it and trying to go around me in the slow lane.

      Meanwhile I have low cost to replace tires, low insurance rates and get 40mpg regardless of how or where I drive it.

      • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I definitely understand. In North Carolina we have Carolina lifted trucks. It’s were the back of the truck is lower than the front. Illegal? Yes. Enforced? No. A real child plowing machine (never thought I would have to write that statement before).

        There is a sect of the population that needs to grow the fuck up and stop worrying about their dick size or how tall they are. We need to have a more realistic view when buying things. Do I need a $100k truck with mud tires and a 12" lift just to pick up the kids from daycare and get groceries? No

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You could probably buy an old junker with no engine, an EV crate engine kit, and pay someone to install it, and still come out under the cost of a new EV, or even recent used one.

  • nikscha@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I often hear people saying “But where does the electricity for the EV come from? Driving an EV is not better than driving a diesel.”

    They have to realize that the thiny ICE in your car is optimised for weight, and has an efficiency of 30-35%. So about ⅔ of the fossil fuel is turned into heat and blown out of the exhaust. Compare that to the turbine in a coal or gas plant, which can archive up to 90% efficiency.

    And don’t forget that an EV is an investment, which will likely still be on the road in 20 years time. The electricity mix at the moment is still rather fossil fuel heavy, but this will change completely within the next 10 years.

    Edit: not 90% but 40% efficiency. See comments below

    • Vikthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Compare that to the turbine in a coal or gas plant, which can archive up to 90% efficiency.

      Nope, you might have seen 90+% efficiency when talking about steam power plants, but that’s the efficiency of the generator(converting the mechanical energy of the the rotating turbogenerator to electricity). You have to multiply with the efficiency of the turbine(converting the energy of the heated gases into the mechanical energy) and there the efficiency is much lower, ~40% for a coal fired and maybe <60% for a gas combined cycle.

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah. Power plants are nowhere near 90% efficient.

        It’s worth emphasizing, though, that they’re still way, way more efficient than car engines are.

        Also, regenerative breaking saves a lot of energy. Basically, instead of using the motor to increase the cars speed, you use it as a generator to recharge the battery.

  • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    How many EVs will it take for fuel prices to start decreasing? Or do prices only react to increased demand 🙃

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Which is amazing news for the planet, they’re greedy though so they’ll probably try and keep it cheap enough to keep people using and maximize profit.

        It’s going to be interesting when a large enough portion of cars on the road are electric that gas stations start to lose enough business to thin out.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s a Democrat in, they’ll want to wait until after the election so they can try get the anti climate party in instead

        Edit - do people not get that I’m saying oil companies favor the gop or do you all disagree?

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The overall number of ICE cars has still only increased and global CO2 emissions are higher than they have ever been. Electric cars literally mean fuck-all.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      China out-emits the whole West combined. Where the West decreased emissions, China increased.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        China is making a lot of moves towards efficiency, their train network for example is outstanding and they’ve invested huge sums in renewables. Plus it’s silly comparing effects of different sized populations,

        The average Chinese person uses far less energy than the average American, about 10.1 tons of carbon pollution annually compared to 17.6 tons in the U.S., according to analyses from the Rhodium Group.

        https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/19/climate/us-china-climate-issues.html