Nintendo Switch emulator Yuzu will utterly fold and pay $2.4M to settle its lawsuit
www.theverge.com
Just about a week after getting sued.

This also includes ceasing development and destroying their copies of the code.

The GitHub repo page for Yuzu now returns a 404, as well. In addition, the repo for the Citra 3DS emulator was also taken down.

As of at least 23:30 UTC, Yuzu’s website and Citra’s website have been replaced with a statement about their discontinuation.

Other sources found by @Daughter3546@lemmy.world:

There is also an active Reddit thread about this: https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/1b6gtb5/

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlineEnglish
      0·
      9 months ago

      Because you’re using the system outside of its intended purpose to break the law. That’s basically the definition of hacking.

      I’m not sure why it being illegal to sell a tool to do that is a hard concept to grasp for so many people.

      I’m not against emulation or pirating, but no shit this was going to happen eventually.

      • tabular@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        4 months ago

        The electronic key I purchased and collected from my own hardware is “hacking” because Nintendo’s doesn’t intend it? Maybe the legality of selling a tool to get the key is a hard concept to grasp because the premise is objectionable. If a Switch makes a good doorstop then it will be doing it’s “intended purpose” if that’s what I intend for my property.

        I’m against companies having unjust control over our own computing.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      0·
      9 months ago

      Nintendo’s angle is more along the lines of:

      • We gave our friend Switchy the keys to a lockbox.
      • You tricked Switchy into giving you our keys.
      • We didn’t authorize you to use those keys.
      • Using our keys without our permission is circumventing our DRM.
      • Yuzu is a tool that enables you to use our keys.
      • It’s illegal to distribute tools to circumvent DRM.

      It’s a massive reach, but it’s a plausible argument—or even a good one if the judge is a technologically illiterate luddite. Beyond that, Nintendo is the kind of litigant that will drag out a lawsuit until the other party is forced to settle.

        • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.worldEnglish
          01·
          9 months ago

          Not sure it will ever get better. Maybe a single person being allowed to decide a case that requires a technical understanding should be consulted by experts in it. I guess a better lawyer probably should have made that happen (shouldn’t have to). But, as the old geezers die off and the younger “tech savvy” people take over, they will no longer be young or tech savvy, technologywill keep progressing and pass us up too. And you don’t want an actual young person as a judge. So… the system is just broken.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    9 months ago

    I wonder how much the “Yuzu is primarily for piracy” thing will hurt yuzu successors off the open sourced code.

  • simple@lemm.eeEnglish
    0·
    9 months ago

    The fuck? Why? Emulators are entirely legal and they could’ve won

    • pivot_root@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      0·
      9 months ago

      Nintendo went after them for using (not distributing) prod.keys to decrypt game titles and system firmware under 17 U.S.C. 1201 (2), which sidesteps having to challenge the legality of emulation directly. I guess Yuzu doesn’t have the funds to fight them in court on that.