My old person trait is that I think ‘ghosting’ is completely unacceptable and you owe the other person a face-to-face conversation.

  • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My old person trait is that none of the things mentioned in the linked image happened on accident.

    They happened because capitalism doesn’t give a fuck about anything except bleeding as much money as conceivably possible out of each and every human.

    1. Apps allow companies to suck more data out of your device than a website, allowing them to sell more of your data and… make more money.

    2. Video games needing access to the internet is simply Digital Rights Management and a way to prevent piracy and… make more money. Remember, most companies view something pirated as a “lost sale,” not that you would have never purchased it to begin with. As Gabe Newell once said:

    “We think there is a fundamental misconception about piracy. Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem,” he said. “If a pirate offers a product anywhere in the world, 24 x 7, purchasable from the convenience of your personal computer, and the legal provider says the product is region-locked, will come to your country 3 months after the US release, and can only be purchased at a brick and mortar store, then the pirate’s service is more valuable."

    1. This one speaks for itself. Being able to be in control of the products you buy is freedom. Having products controlled remotely by a corporation is giving them carte blanche to make more money off of you.

    2. Removing accessible customer service means more people will just give up on trying to get their problem solved, effectively allowing the company to steal from people and… shocker… make more money.


    I agree, in theory, in respect to ghosting, but we live in a society that teaches us to be isolated, and doesn’t teach interpersonal skills unless the interpersonal skill is “Fuck you, got mine.” (which is, not surprisingly, a thing about making more money.)

    In other words, these aren’t old people opinions. These are “I’m not gonna let capitalism absolutely fuck me endlessly” opinions.

  • littlecolt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As someone who works in a call center, screw that last person on here. So sorry you hate the automated system. Sorry you had to wait on hold. They can’t keep enough of us employed because y’all are fucking mean and no one wants to be abused for $15/hr.

    Er, I mean, Thank you for calling, sorry about your wait!

  • Carlos Solís@communities.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My old person trait is that when I purchase a printer, I should be able to use whatever is the cheapest compatible ink without the printer treating me like I’m smuggling unicorn blood out of Narnia

  • lobelia581@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    my old person trait is thinking that all of the above are extremely reasonable expectations and it’s a sad world we live in where most of those aren’t the case anymore

  • Nano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    These are not old person traits, these are just things that most people agree upon.

  • Zephyr@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I prefer to talk to individuals on phones rather than texting a long conversation. If it’s a quick question (yes/no) or short answer texting is ok. But I find it taking longer and more tedious to text out an ongoing conversation over 20 minutes versus just calling and getting straight to the point and getting the information you need in 5 minutes.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate all websites that move things around as they load. If I see a button, that button should stay where it is when I try to click it.

    • mrnomoniker@lemmy.studio
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The number of times the “news” headline display shows me something that catches my interest and then disappears and refreshes to something else before I was able to finish reading it infuriates me.

  • nik282000@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think cars should not be dependent on a touch screen for ANY of it’s functions (or really have one at all). They are more difficult to use than tactile buttons, distracting, and do not receive long term support from the OEM.

    What do you do with a 10 year old car that runs but the touch screen nuked due to age, firmware bugs or mechanical damage? Ford isn’t going to be selling replacement units 10 years later and I have yet to see an ‘infotainment’ system that has aftermarket replacement considerations.

  • shadowfly@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    • Just installed a messenger. It uses more RAM than my first PC had for displaying a simple, empty list. I find that inexcusable.
    • hollowstrawberry@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Electron is built on several layers of inefficiencies that each grant ease of development. We also have a thousand times more RAM than we did back then. I think it’s a fair trade.

    • rob64@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s worth noting though that the shitty music of yesteryear doesn’t persist in the public consciousness. When we think of music from previous generations, we’re thinking about the stuff that was good enough to last (or bad enough, I suppose, if it’s notably bad). So the popular music of today may seem to be dominated by shit, but you’d have to examine what else was on the airwaves of a given era to really make a good comparison.

      I also think there’s two major factors brought on by technological advancement and they both have a positive side. There are a lot more avenues to discover music than there have ever been. Musicians no longer have to be extremely talented and have broad appeal to reach an audience. From the listener’s point of view, it’s much easier to find good music that fits your particular tastes. And I think that in turn leaves more room in the mainstream avenues for lower quality but broadly appealing music.

      The other factor is the accessibility of the technology to make and share music, which I think makes it easier for both “good” and “bad” music to find it’s way outside of the artist’s bedroom, so to speak.

      • joe@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        well said. well said. you dont exactly need a record company for your music to reach an audience these days, you can do what you like and no one can say ‘this wont sell, fuck off,’ you can have your own small audience that loves and respects you.

        but another argument is that the current ‘top’ artists are ‘on the top’ because they have their names. if they published an album with another name, i believe it would be challenged. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Stephen King gained significant popularity as a horror writer. However, he wanted to test if his success was solely due to his name or if his writing could stand on its own. To do this, King created the pen name Richard Bachman, and people loved the supposed Richard Bachman books.

  • Navarian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Likely an outdated one, or one that’s already been given a number of times, but – Physical Books.

    I’m not entirely ‘anti’ e-reader, the benefits are obvious. I’m just VERY pro physical book.

    • I love physical books, but I love eReaders more. I’ve loved digital books since before digital books existed.

      My love for digital books started when I was in college, and was lugging around a backpack full of fucking heavy dead trees. I spent countless hours fantasizing about a future where I could carry my entire library around in a single, small device.

      You often see the lament: “it’s the future! Where’s my flying car‽” But, my friend, we are living in the future, one where my most cherished desire - the ability to literally fit every book I own into a single portable device - has come true.

      I even have a second device, the dimensions of a standard US sheet of paper, on which I can write and easily read PDFs formatted for print; I can even run OCR on the notes and get pretty good results - this eliminated the endless, unsearchable notebooks that were my second plague. One day, this device will be foldable, and I’ll be able to combine the two uses into one device.

      I do still own, and occasionally buy, paper books. When I do, they’re books I’ve already greatly enjoyed, and want to have hard-bound copies of. I curtail this behavior, as I’ve moved home a dozen times in my life already, and each time culled large portions of my library. For years, nobody accepts paper books, and they mostly go to recycling, which I always fine painful. It’s one of the worst parts of moving, choosing either to haul around more heavy boxes or send less cherished books to be destroyed. The books I do buy are destined for the bookshelf; I buy these only for nostalgia, and it is unlikely that their spines will ever be broken.

      My true love is e-ink; my library exists both on my computer (backed up) and on my eReader, always and fully accessible whether at home or travelling, and never taking up more space than a notepad. I had moved on long before the means to move on were available, and have never looked back.

      • Piers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re in the UK, next-time you’re forced to do a cull, try to see if you can find (or just start) a Bookcycle/Shelfcycle nearby. There aren’t many yet but they’re growing. It’s a charity explicitly designed to do a better job of valuing donated books than existing infrastructure. They worked out that places like schools in developing worlds can often make great use of the books that other charity shops would destroy because they don’t sell quickly in UK charity book shops. So Bookcycle sells the ones that would to raise funds to send the ones that wouldn’t as a donation to communities that would value them. They try really hard not to destroy any book that someone might still find value in somewhere.

  • GutterPunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Driving slow, leaving early and arriving early. I usually drive a bit below the speed limit, and always follow speed limit signs. It keeps people safe, even if their own impatience makes them tailgate eachother 10 cars in a row behind me. Some people like to be in a hurry when they drive and don’t know how to relax and drive calmly, I’ve never been sure why.

  • Nurgle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the love of god stop with the QR code menus. I don’t want to have to scroll up and down a million times to figure out my order.