• Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Imagine a world where we had politicians who understood technology enough to put proper rules and requirements in place, so that big dumb companies would actually be forced to act ethically and sustainably…

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    Another vote for Linux Mint. I finally switched from Windows 10 months ago and I love it.

    I’m really enjoying the learning curve with Linux because I’m not always fighting the operating system. On the other hand, every time I’ve had to go “under the hood” with Windows (edit the Registry, change config files) it’s been to stop Microsoft from doing something sh*tty to me.

    • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Rofl relatable. Me when i was trying to force uninstall edge or turn off windows activation logo

    • ZiemekZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ve just installed it on my Dell Latitude E6330. It’s great, but am I the only one who gets his laptop restarted instead of powered off? It happened both on Mint and Zorin OS, never on Windows.

    • BingBong@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I tossed Mint on a VM briefly and really disliked it. Specifically finding the terminal was painful. Did they bury it pretty deep or did I just overlook it?

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        By default there is a shortcut to the terminal shortcut on task bar. From memory it is one of three default shortcuts. (File browser, Terminal, Firefox.) You can also find it by pressing the menu button (the ‘start menu’). From there the terminal has a prominent special position where it is always accessible. And if you don’t notice it there, you can always start typing to search for it - as with any other installed app. I find that if I type ‘t’, then “Terminal” is the top result; and obviously I can kept typing to eliminate the other results if I want.

        So if your difficulty in finding the terminal is your main complaint about about Mint… I’m not sure what to tell you. Do you want it to auto-launch or something?

        • Corr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Ctrl + alt + t opens a terminal in most DE I’ve used as well

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    Three years ago, I bought my wife a laptop with Windows 10 to replace her 10yo windows 7 machine.

    It had hardware issues out of the box, and went in on two repairs. It works fine now, AFAIK.

    But, she still doesn’t trust it, and she doesn’t think that she can move her Adobe CS6 license over to it…

    I even bought her the affinity suite.

    I’m starting to think she’ll never move on from Windows 7.

    I think the major browsers stopped supporting it sometime during the last year, so my best hope is that some included certificates will eventually make her favourite websites stop working. That has to force her over to something more recent… right?

    I use arch, btw.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    They should be required to release drivers such that massive e-waste wasn’t generated suddenly. I mean, why does the government allow a software company to own an monopolize the hardware? Hello Google! Good luck 🤞 with the monopoly assholes!

    • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think that any operating system that mostly runs 3rd party software should be legally required to open-source at least the components necessary to run said 3rd party software. Also, OSes should just straight up not be allowed to show ads, full-stop. Making people buy hardware and then bloating the OS with ads in updates is a bait and switch and if our government had any balls, would be illegal.

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not to mention that we pay for the bandwidth they use to show us ads. Like WTF! Since when did NBC as people to chip in for them to show us McDonald’s commercials?

        • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Not just the bandwidth, but RAM usage, energy consumption, and cache storage space. Ads cost us money.

    • ftbd@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I hate Microsoft as much as the next guy, but which drivers do you have in mind? You can install Linux on almost any machine, and if there are driver issues the culprits are usually nvidia, realtek, etc. for which Microsoft is hardly responsible.

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Oh my gosh 🤯 you are definitely not old enough. Microsoft has hardware by the balls because they own the eyeball markets at work. They can make a company that makes Ethernet cards for example change their API. It’s pretty simple to just end Linux by denying it hardware. So that’s why we must defend against that sort of monopoly which kept modems unobtainable to Linux for example. That was the great awakening, the modem wars.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    If Linux didn’t exist, we would actually end up with a lot of e-waste, and I mean a fuck ton of it. And it’s all thanks to you, Microsoft.

    Hell, Linux does exist, and people just don’t wanna use it because they’re so used to Windows that anything else is basically as steep of a learning curve as a literal cliff. And to those people I say: “just add some mint on it and life will be easy. Maybe even drizzle some cinnamon on it as well”

    • PushButton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Linux is in a weird spot, there is a valley you must not be in with it.

      If you are a non-technical person who needs only a browser and solitaire, it’s perfect.

      If you are a highly technical person, it’s great.

      If you’re just in between, you are fucked.

      • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Trying to get games to run without being a Linux pro is much harder than I was led to believe. Some games just work out of the box, but a lot of them absolutely do NOT, even if protondb says they will.

        • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          The Steam Deck is trying to make Linux gaming more hassle-free, but it’s not like we’ve reached that stage yet. Still, we’re taking steps.

            • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              i do not agree with that sentiment. i’m an avid gamer, and in the last few weeks since switching to nobara i only found 1 obscure game that didn’t work, and 2 that needed an entry in the preferences of the game in steam. using heroic launcher for all amazon/epic/gog games and lutris for my piracy tryouts (would work in heroic too, but it’s cleaner that way)

              but i must admit that the experience is smoother in windows; i miss my playnite launcher which integrated everything from steam to other stores, pirated games and all emulation needs.

              • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                I guess dual-booting is still a necessity for some of us, unless you have a single hard drive and your Windows installation decides to randomly break.

              • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Maybe I’m just really unlucky when it comes to liking games that don’t work on Linux.

                • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  that might be. i am a pure single-player (with a bit of local coop mixed in) player, and i prefer roguelites, VNs with actual gaming elements and FPS / “Immersive Sim”-Style games, and currently the Vampire Survivor category with Yet another Zombie Survival and Halls of Torment. I try out a lot of games (If theres a Fitgirl or DODI release of it and even somewhere in my ballpark i’ll test it).

                  Most issues i have stem from modding games without Workshop support, using external Mod Managers like Vortex sucks on Linux.

            • ftbd@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I have also encountered games that needed tweaking (like changing settings in an .ini file that weren’t visible in the game’s menu) to run in an acceptable way on windows. Does this mean that Windows is ‘not quite there yet’, or is the game to blame?

              • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Sure, but it’s not impossible to play any Blizzard games because the launcher login page is broken like it is on Linux. Blaming the game will only get you so far when so many games just don’t work and devs don’t care.

    • rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Started using linux mint 22 since 2 months great experience. Difficult with some software with wine winetricks and bottles and stuff. I’m not in any tech field. Learnt from YouTube. Still more to learn… But it’s fun to figuring things out and chatgpt

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ve installed Linux mint cinnamon on some PCs for other people. It’s okay. I still run into errors and difficulties but for your average non techie person it might work if someone else gets them started.

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    The only reason I’m on 10 with my main pc is because the 7th gen intel in there isn’t compatible with win11. I have another pc that is 7th gen, which I put windows 11 on and there is just something weird about it. When I do anything on that machine it doesn’t do it immediately, it sits for a few seconds before actions are done. Really aggravating. Clicking on a program on the taskbar takes a few seconds before it opens. File explorer, firefox browser, settings pane, … Once programs are running it’s fine to use said programs, but I wonder what they did to make it feel this way.

    I have Linux on both machines as primary OS and they are super snappy, it’s not the hardware.

    • janNatan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      How much RAM do the systems have? 8gb? The delay may be in the system making room in ram for the program. Win11 is so ram hungry. It’s stupid.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        They both have 16GB RAM.

        The one with Windows 10 has a i5 7600k and GTX1060

        The one with Windows 11 has a i7 7700k and GTX1080

        Both with nvme ssd storage samsung evo (cant remember which exactly). The 7600k machine even has hdds and ssds via sata extra.

    • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I had Windows 10 on an older (but not ancient) machine and it was literally unusable. 10-15 minute boot time and another 5 or so just to get a browser to open. The misery didn’t end once things were open; everything was still slower than when I had windows 7 on what would now be considered a truly ancient machine. I put Linux on it and experienced a roughly 5x speedup.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    I use Win10 for one single program only and I’m currently testing on how to take that machine offline, but still be accessible locally. So far all I got is a blacklist regex in pihole. Blocking internet access to that machine via my router does not work for me, as I dual boot that machine with Linux for gaming. Tips per DM are very welcome actually.

    • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      Two options:

      • Change the DNS and gateway so they’re pointing to 0.0.0.0
      • Give the Windows install a static IP or lease, and block that IP on the router
    • undu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Make Linux use a random MAC address, then block the physical MAC in the DHCP section of the router’e configuration. This will make Windows unablento recieve an IP address while Linux will be able to get ahold of one.

      If windows uses tandom mac addresses, the feature should be able to be turned off.

      Or, simply disable the network interfaces in Windows’ control panel. I’ve never seen Windows reenable a network card by itself.

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Static IP on the windows machine in a jail’d subnet, if you still want to be able to access it from the LAN but don’t want it to have internet access.

      If you’re happy with it not having any kind of network access (I’m not sure if when you say ‘locally’ you mean just physically, or it needs LAN as well), just disable the network adapter in windows.

    • Chloë (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Maybe have a script change your local IP address? You could for instance change your IP after logging into Linux and change before powering off.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    does it take a year to build an OS that doesnt track/sell you and try to hide its doing so?

  • cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I have a feeling that Microsoft will release an update that will at the very least make Windows 10 miserable to use if not downright unbootable the day support ends

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    273
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    I mean, they could solve it by not making the mandatory successor an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. That would be a start. And also relax whatever the artificial requirement is that makes a lot of Win10 machines incompatible with 11.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      You can bypass the requirements since yeah, they were always artificial. I believe Rufus has an option when creating Win11 install USBs to remove the TPM and other requirements.

      But then again, it’s nice, because all I need to make sure Microsoft doesn’t secretly update my Win10 machine in the night to Win11 is to turn off the TPM in the BIOS.

      • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        But then you won’t receive any updates if you use unsupported hardware to run Win 11

      • john117@lemmy.jmsquared.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        You can bypass the requirements since yeah, they were always artificial.

        I think bypassing these checks would eventually render your PC vulnerable? for example, bitlocker support being void for computers that relies on TPM 2.0

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          8 days ago

          There is no home-user need to run bitlocker. There’s dozens of alternatives, that do not rely on TPM, that are just as effective, and that you really should be using anyways since they aren’t controlled by M$.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        You can bypass the requirements

        Not all of them. Windows 11 stopped booting with Update 24H2 on CPUs that don’t support the Instruction POPCNT. But that’s only an issue for really old CPUs like Intel Core 2 Duo and AMD Athlon 64 X2

          • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Another angle: Those were some of the first dual-core x86 processors, released 2006 and 2005 respectively. (Intel had the Pentium D as its first in 2005).

            I don’t remember which I had for sure. I’m leaning more towards Core 2 Duo. It was my first PC, I was 12 and built it with my father.

            • xthexder@l.sw0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              I also got my first computer around then. I saved up for ages and bought the first gen Intel MacBook with an Intel Core Duo (2 cores, no hyperthreading). I still have that laptop somewhere… It blew my mind it could run Windows, and Windows laptops couldn’t compare at the time.

      • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Rufus has that option, I’ve used it myself to update to Win11 because I didn’t have a motherboard with TPM at the time.
        Also wanna mention, the reason I updated was mostly because I thought Win10 was kinda ugly and I think Win11 was a huge update in that regard and also because of security reasons, since Win10 won’t receive any more updates in the near future. At the end of the day, I can count on one hand how often I boot Windows in a year (I almost exclusively use Linux), so I don’t really care about all the Win11 bullshit anyway.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Windows 10 is already an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. The problem with 11 is the ridiculous hardware requirements.

      Windows 10 is trash and has always been. Windows 7 was the last good Windows, and I would still use it if it had security updates and DX12 support (I obviously mainly use Linux, but my gaming PC is on Windows, and no, some games I play and software I use 100% do not work on Linux).

      • LiPoly@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Amen. I am 100% convinced that the only reason Windows 10 was received this well was because of their tremendous marketing efforts around the release. People just accepted that it’s a great OS. It’s exactly like that Windows Vista Mojave experiment, just in reverse. In my opinion Windows 10 is even worse than Windows 11. But they didn’t do as much marketing around Windows 11.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Probably is. I use Linux for everything and only use Win10 at work on a VM with enterprise/LTSB version, so I’ve been shielded from most of its enshittification.

    • pycorax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      Having used both, doesn’t 11 have the same level of ads as 10 did? It seems like it’s really only OneDrive ads if you don’t use it if anything?

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Maybe? I just said in another comment that I am pretty much exclusively Linux. I only occasionally use a W10 VM at work, and it’s enterprise/LTSB so I don’t get a lot of that junk.

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          100 point top thread based on the second and third hand opinions of a Windows non-user really sums up the quality of this discussion lol

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’ve lost count of the amount of posts and comment threads on here about “all the horrible ads and spyware” where the solution was to flip literally a single switch in Settings, Personalization.

    • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Nope, they wont. Micro$oft only cares money rather than basic OS for everyday and professional tasks

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        They’ve been adding spyware and ads into W10 so it’s not the money. They could easily add all W11 ads/spyware into 10 with an update. Older CPUs have several hardware vulnerabilities unrelated to the TPU required by W11.

        IMO, they should add a startup message listing the hardware vulnerabilities of the installed CPU and leave it up to the customer.

        • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          Windows 11 has more spyware and its more ens***tificated

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yes but that could be added in a W10 update just like they’ve already done with previous W10 updates.

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    I know it’s not a hardware compatibility problem. People just don’t want ads/tracking/AI bullshit, a removed control panel, settings that are hard to find/hidden, etc.

    All intel processor 8th gen+ (and even some 7th gen IIRC) are win11 compatible, motherboard have TPM2 for years, even my intel 6th gen MB have TPM2.0.

    Next year the intel 8th gen will have 8 years, people have PC/laptop more recent than that. Problem is that win10 will not get security updates and all.

    I’m using MX Linux BTW.

    • CommanderShepard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Most people don’t care or even know that it is AI/ad-infested. I’ve seen people just fighting through pop-up on multiple websites they use. When ci fronted by me, they just said that they have “tunnel vision” and don’t care.

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      My 80+ year old parents don’t care about ads or AI. They just want a working PC, and W11 won’t install on the cheap machine they got a few years ago. They’re not going to buy a new one because this works perfectly fine.

      And yes they tried Linux for several years, but went back to Windows because it was just too much hassle and not compatible with too many things.

      It absolutely is a hardware problem.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s not a hardware compatibility problem for you or people who have reasonably new computers. However, for the last decade or so, computers have kind of stagnated and old computers are still very functional, something I couldn’t have said a decade or two ago.

      I’m typing this on a ThinkPad x201 which was released in 2010. TBF, I’ve updated it as much as I can (8GB of RAM and an SSD), it’s running Linux Mint because Windows drags, and even then it’s getting tired.

      My Spouse’s laptop is an Acer with a 5th gen i3. A couple years ago, she was complaining it was getting a bit slow, so I threw an SSD in it and now she’s happy with how it runs Windows 10, and I’m sure it would run Windows 11 fine if a TPM2.0 chip wasn’t required.

      It’s forced obsolesces for a hardware requirement most home users are never going to use.

      • UnpledgedCatnapTipper@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        My parents are using a 3rd gen i7 and it works fine. My brother has a few computers, one is a 2nd gen intel, but I think he put Linux on that one. My home server was running on my 4th gen i7 until I upgraded it to my second gen Ryzen earlier this year after I upgraded my gaming.

      • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        CPUs from around 2005 onward are all perfectly usable IMO for the purposes of x86 desktops. As long as it’s got x86_64, SSE4 and at least two available threads. I would even wager that Pentium 4 hyperthreaded models (Wolfdale?) are still acceptable if we’re really pushing it.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m currently using a trick on my Windows 11 work machine to get the old UI for file explorer by going through the control panel and going up a directory.

      I’ll be so pissed the day they strip it out, because their new design language is ridiculously slow and terrible for the sake of “cleanliness.”

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I still got a Ryzen 1600, that would be just fine for when my flatmate needs a PC for working remotely, but his company reqires Windows 11 :-(

  • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m just waiting for the EOL of window 10 to see which of the following will happen:

    1. Many PCs will stop getting updates, people don’t care
    2. Many PCs will be replaced for windows 11
    3. Turns out people already have replaced their PCs due to other reasons
    4. Microsoft removes the hardware requirements
    5. People switch to another OS
    6. People just don’t buy a home PC anymore
    7. ???
    8. Profit???
    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ll save you the wait. It’s 1 with quite a bit of 6.

      Normal people just don’t need PCs that much any more. Nearly everything that people did on a PC you can do on a phone.

      If you can’t do it on a phone, then it’s usually called work, and employers can replace things as needed. Although we’ve still got customers using variants of Windows XP, so don’t hold your breath. Some employers just aren’t beholden to higher ups that demand security audits.

    • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      240 millions PC will become e-waste if Win10 reaches EoL

      • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 days ago

        EoL doesn’t mean it will stop completely; people will probably keep using it till they can’t anymore, like pc becoming too slow or their home banking site not working.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Realistically it will live for as long as Google Chrome still works and sites don’t start getting picky about TLS 1.3.

        • Not a replicant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’ve got an Asus eeePC running WinXP. It’s air-gapped and the wi-fi is disabled in BIOS. All it does is play music, connected to dumb speakers. I update the music periodically via USB. Remarkably reliable and long-lived hardware.

    • Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      6 is becoming increasingly more common. Anecdotally, almost all of the gamers I know use consoles and have a phone for all of their “computer needs.” One of my friends probably wouldn’t even use his if it weren’t for VR Chat.

    • huzzahunimpressively@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      My bet is that they are gonna surrender and will remove restriccions to W11. I doubt that a non-it person gonna install Linux, at least that, some companies decided to resell old~ computers with linux preinstalled that’s the only way

      • Sabata@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        My money is on MS kicking the can down the road and adding another year or two to the support last minute, then not fixing any of the issues with 11.

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          The paid extended security update program is going to run until 2028, and Windows 10 IoT Enterprise 2021 LTSC is going to have extended support all the way until 2032.

          They have stated that ESU is going to be available to consumers as well, though not for how much - but somewhere between the $61 of the commercial, and $1 (really) of the education license, with the price doubling every year.

          • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 Or won’t take long before it gets too expensive at that rate

            • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              1, 2, 4. Then it’s 2028 and ESU ends. No idea how the pricing for the IoT long term support thing is done though.

    • krippix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I don’t see the os switch happening unless microsoft stops existing in its entirety.

      Abandoning home PCs could be a thing I guess, but i feel like that would happen either way for these people

      • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        I doubt the os switch is happening too, some will probably switch but that will be a small amount, either they get Linux or afaik all other “popular” options require new hardware anyways (Macos)

        I think many will just stay on windows 10 if their hardware doesn’t support 11 but ehh

        Difficult to say, that’s why I’m waiting on the EOL for headlines like “millions of pcs vulnerable due to missing updates” or “maybe we were a little hard on crowdstrike”

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          This is one of those things where home users just default to PC = Windows. But apps are all online now. Probably 99% of the time all people need is a browser. Yeah some people think they have to have MS Office or some other niche windows program, but I consider myself a power-user and the only apps I open on my PC are Games, Discord, IntelliJ, VSCode, and then maybe fool around with local AI stuff. Photos and stuff are usually on our phones, but they can also all be backed up to the cloud from a computer easily enough.

          I’ve already switched over to Linux because all of that stuff already works. (Caveat: I also have a PS5 for most gaming).

          Most people just need someone to install Linux Mint or whatever and they wouldn’t even notice the difference. The only thing really slowing Linux adoption is folks who don’t want to field support calls from their friends and family.

        • Joeffect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Linux has been gaining market share, it’s at 4.5% or so, it’s not much but just until recently it never even hit 3%

          Maybe Valve has something to do with it but who knows… I think we will see a bigger jump and it will start being as common as os x or something… I plan to switch and have been trying out different things