• SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    So OP has posted this everywhere, even getting it flagged on Hacker News. Article is weak sauce:

    I would agree with author that there are many problems with Spotify but concentrating on the artist revenue per stream and then publishing your top hits of the year as YouTube links? Really? Go and find out what the artist share per stream is on YouTube (regular YouTube video) for soundtracks. I’ll wait. Hint: there’s a reason that soundtracks using unauthorised copyrighted work get muted or taken down rather than revenue being redistributed.

    Recommending a paid desktop MacOS music app for local content? There are hundreds of local music players but OK… but none of the criticisms of Spotify were about the client! Foobar2000 (mentioned for mobile playback) supports Spotify streaming

    Article seems to boil down to ‘I got tired of Spotify recommendations and I am an aspiring musician at an early stage in my professional career so I am recommending Bandcamp and soap boxing about artist revenue share’ . There’s a reason that people, some with local music libraries in the TeraByte range listen to Spotify. There’s also all the competing services - Apple Music; YouTube; Deezer; Tidal; Amazon; etc…

    Recommendation to OP: If you are trying to persuade people on something, then decide what point you want to concentrate on, consider the pro’s and cons for your position, and make your point based/reinforced on that. Don’t meander around a bunch of inchoate personal gripes and affections that don’t really relate to one another or any particular point.

      • farhanfrezz@r.nf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s an interesting approach! Using Spotube to bypass their app entirely sounds innovative. Though it might not be super stable, it’s great to see creative solutions being explored!

  • geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    And in 2024, Spotify will stop paying out songs which get less than 1000 streams in a year. Which means for me, as an artist in the early stages of my career, I am going to get paid nothing. I could get over 1000 streams on all my songs in total, but still get paid nothing. I could get 999 streams on a song one year and 999 streams on it the next year… and still get paid nothing.

    As the author states in the previous paragraph, Spotify pays 0.003c per stream. I don’t think the author has done the maths. 1000 streams equals 3c. He’s complaining over not getting paid 3c as if that will fund his career

    • clgoh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not 0.003¢ per steam, it’s $0.003. (Actually £0.003, per that article.)

      So 1000 streams should pay $3.